语言康复训练对脑卒中后偏瘫失语患者语言功能的改善作用.doc

语言康复训练对脑卒中后偏瘫失语患者语言功能的改善作用.doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
语言康复训练对脑卒中后偏瘫失语患者语言功能的改善作用.doc

i犒AS训帥 吾患鮒轴 作用 2018-03-29 10:29:48中国现代医生2018年5期 黄岩金灵青 [摘要]戸的探讨语言康复训练对脑卒屮后偏瘫失语患者语言功能的改善作用。方法选取 2016年1月?20仃年5月脑卒中后偏瘫失语患者80例,应用抛硕币法将其分为两组。两组予控制 血糖、血压和颅丿玉、营养脑神经和增加脑部血供等治疗。对照组予常规健康干预,干预组在对照组基 础上予Schuell言语康复训练干预,45 m泊/次,2次/周,干预8周。观察两组干预前后语言功能改 善情况,并比较其临床效果。结果干预8周后,两组言语表达、听理解力、阅读能力和书写能力等 各项语言功能明显改善(P0.05或PvO.01),且干预组改善情况优于对照组(PvO.05):同时干预 组临床总有效率高于对照组(x2=4.07, P0.05)。结论语言康复训练治疗脑卒中后偏瘫失语患者 的临床效果较确切,能减轻神经功能缺损,改善语言功能。 [关键词]脑卒中;偏瘫;失语;语言康复训练;语言功能 [中图分类号]R743.3 [文献标识码]B [文章编号]1673?9701 (2018) 05-0075-04 [Abstract] Objective To discuss the improvement effect of language rehabilitation training on Ianguage function of patients with hemiplegia and dysphasia after stroke? Methods A total of 80 cases of patients with hemiplegia and dysphasia after stroke during the period from January 2016 to May 2017 were divided into two groups by tossing the coin. The patients in two groups were given control of blood sugar, blood pressure and intracranial pressure, nutrition of brain nerves and increasing blood supplement of brain, and the patients in control group were routine health in tervention, while the patients in in terve ntion group were additi on ally given Schuell la nguage rehabilitation training, 45 minutes per time, twice a week, on the basis of those in control group for 8 weeks. The Ianguage function improvement in two groups were observed and compared before and after intervention, and the clinical curative effect was compared as well. Results After 8 weeks intervention, verbal expression, listening comprehension, reading ability and writing ability of language function in two groups were obviously improved (P0.05 or P0.01) , and the improvement in intervention group was much higher than that in control group (P0.05)? Mean while, total clinical efficiency in in terve ntion group was higher than that in control group (/2=4.07\ P0.05) ? Conclusion The language rehabilitation training has reliable clinical curative effect on patients with hemiplegia and dysphasia after stroke, which

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档