- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
En
English Abstract
II
II
Abstract
As one of the most significant ways to communicate, writing is an important tool to promote language acquisition in second language learning. Feedback, which is a significant part of writing instruction, has already become an important issue in current SLA study. In recent years, many scholars have done a lot of research about the writing feedback. However, most of the research in this field in China is based on the theories introduced from abroad, and the research conducted in the Chinese teaching context is far from enough.
Based on an experiment and a questionnaire, this study examined 40 non-English majors from Xingxiang College of Xiangtan University. It aimed to solve the following three questions: (1) what are the characteristics of teacher feedback and peer feedback during the revision process? (2) What are the effects of teacher feedback and peer feedback on the quality of writing? (3) What is students’ attitude toward the two types of feedback?
In the experiment, forty students were randomly divided into two groups on average: the teacher feedback group (hereafter called TFG) that received the written feedback from teachers and the peer feedback group (hereafter called PFG) that received the written feedback from a group of peer students. A comparative analysis of the scores the two groups received in their writing, together with the result of the questionnaire, resulted in the following conclusions: (1) teachers offered more usable feedback points and fewer unusable feedback points than peers. In terms of the focus of feedback, teacher feedback focused more on grammar and content but less on vocabulary. Peer feedback focuses more on grammar and vocabulary but less on organization. (2) With the process-oriented writing approach, the writing of both TFG and PFG was improved, but teacher feedback is more effective than peer feedback. In terms of the revisions students made with the help of feedback, students in TFG made mor
您可能关注的文档
- 蒋防律赋分析-中国古代文学专业论文.docx
- 胶质母细胞瘤中长链非编码RNA在单细胞水平的表达异质性分析-生物化学与分子生物学专业论文.docx
- 教改背景下大学英语教师实践性知识及其发展策略探究-外国语言学及应用语言学专业论文.docx
- 蒋光慈笔下的上海书写-中国现当代文学专业论文.docx
- 胶质气体泡沫的制备及其驱油性能的研究-化学工程与技术专业论文.docx
- 蒋骥《传神秘要》分析-美术学专业论文.docx
- 教改下实施的同伴互批对学习者英语写作影响的探究-学科教学(英语)专业论文.docx
- 教科书可读性评价研究-比较教育学专业论文.docx
- 胶质细胞adam10基因敲除与脑出血的关系研究-神经病学专业论文.docx
- 教科书习题与课程标准一致性的比较研究-学科教学(化学)专业论文.docx
- 胶州湾海-气CO2通量及其控制-环境科学专业论文.docx
- 教师反馈与同侪反馈对高中生英语写作影响的比较研究-教育学专业论文.docx
- 胶州湾海水环境质量评价及污染防治研究-环境科学专业论文.docx
- 教师反馈与自动反馈对非英语专业学生写作的影响对比-外国语言学及应用语言学专业论文.docx
- 降低ARGG汽油烯烃含量的分析-化学工程专业论文.docx
- 降低ARGG汽油烯烃含量的研究-化学工程专业论文.docx
- 降低CY6102BZLQ增压中冷型柴油机有害排放物的试验及研究-动力工程专业论文.docx
- 教师反思的理论研究与现实思考-教育学原理专业论文.docx
- 胶州湾海域海岸带综合管理分析-环境规划与管理专业论文.docx
- 教师反思性教学实践分析-学科教学(历史)专业论文.docx
最近下载
- 大学生职业生涯规划.pdf VIP
- 2025广西中考化学真题试卷及答案 .pdf VIP
- 内生真菌A21-1-1在防治水稻稻瘟病中的应用.pdf VIP
- 99038 法学毕业考核 自考考试大纲.docx VIP
- 工 程 报 价 单模板.docx VIP
- 中医耳鼻咽喉科学喉痈课件.pptx VIP
- (新)电大资源网11379《人文英语3》国家开放大学期末考试题库(476)[期末纸考+一平台机考]-已排版.pdf VIP
- 2024北京中医药大学第二批管理岗、专职辅导员岗、其他专技岗招聘笔试备考试题及答案解析.docx VIP
- 犯罪学(00235)自考复习资料.doc VIP
- 2025年北京中医药大学管理岗、专职辅导员岗、实验技术岗、其他专技岗招聘笔试模拟试题及答案解析.docx VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)