几种降雨侵蚀力模型比较研究.PDFVIP

26 1 Vol. 26, No. 1 2006 2 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation Feb. , 2006 1 1 2 1 3 胡续礼, 潘剑君, 杨树江, 姜小三 , 高太成 ( 1. , 210095; 2. , 233001; 3. , 46 300) : 4 a 49 , EI30 CREAMS Richardson , EI 30 3 , , 3 : 0. 8 0. 55, 0. 5 0. 34, 0. 45 0. 22 0. 16~ 1. 2 , 0. 24~ 1.46, 0. 40~ 0. 84 Creams , , : ; ; ; ; : A : 1000 288X( 2006) 01 0068 03 : S15 . 1 Comparative Study on Rainfall Erosivity Models Using Daily Rainfall Amounts 1 1 2 1 3 HU Xu-li , PAN Jian-jun , YANG Shu-jiang , JIANG Xiao-san , GAO Tai-cheng ( 1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanj ing Agricultural Univeksity, Nanj ing 210095, Jiangsu rovince, China; 2. Water and Soil Conversation Monitoring Central Station of the Huaihe R iv er Basion, Bengbu 230003, A nhui rovince, China; 3. Water and Soil Conversation Station in L ushan County of He nan rovince, L ushan 46 300, He nan rovince, China) Abstract: Based on 49 single rainfall data from the Lushan County station of soil and water conversation in Henan Province, various values of rainfall erosivity were calculated using the RUSLE, CREAM S, RICHARDSON and a revised model of daily rainfall amount developed by Guoxinbo, respectively. Results show that model efficients are 0. 8 0. 55, 0. 5 0. 34, 0. 45 0. 22, respectively. Tested results show CREAM S modol is better than other tw o models, but it is not appropriate to direct use. The better parameters should be found in future.