利用ATM机过错取款行为的定罪与量刑一体化分析——以许霆案为范本刑事诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

利用ATM机过错取款行为的定罪与量刑一体化分析——以许霆案为范本刑事诉讼法专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
1 1 2 2 Abstract The case about Xu Tin had caused widespread concern several years ago .Although the case has been concluded after some discussion, but I think it is also necessary to look a lot of focus in the case from a new perspective, such as re-determined to steal financial institutions from extended look forward to the possibility of mitigated punishment applicable understood the significance. The same time, the remaining issues of the case and not completely solved. For example, the crux of the second paragraph of Article 63 of the Criminal Code applicable judicial not get enough attention; how to clarify the powers and responsibilities of the relationship between the Bank and behavior; how perfect for ATM error brought a series of legal problems, also has yet to respond. I for some combing wording ideas, I hope to provide some reference solutions of similar cases. This article is made of 20,000 words and divided into five parts: The first part , Xu Tin came to a city of a banks automatic teller machine to withdraw money, inadvertently enter a digital, wanted to take one hundred, he did not expect the ATM actually spits out one thousand, and I am carrying amount only less one, his own account, only more than 100 pieces. After several withdrawals of more than ten million, the defendant would abscond, in case there are many controversial period of the case never commuted into a five-year term. The second part , the focus of the disputes which are summarized. Focus of controversy three: First, recognize the different nature of the withdrawal behavior; Second, differences in conviction; Thirds opinion of sentencing. The third part ,the focus of the dispute is the analysis of criminal law. First, the nature of the acts, the subsequent withdrawal behavior infringes on the legal interests, harmful to society, has to look forward to the possibility, therefore identified as criminal in nature; Second conviction, Xu Tings behavior constitutes theft. Come to the defend

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jianzhongdahong + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档