微创置管引流术治疗HICH患者的效果及预后观察.docVIP

微创置管引流术治疗HICH患者的效果及预后观察.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
微创置管引流术治疗HICH患者的效果 及预后观察 刘志刚李华张良君张宪起张志银袁兴田刚 陕西省第四人民医院神经外科 口的:探讨微创置管引流术治疗高血压脑出血(I1ICI1)患者的临床效果及对患者 预后的影响。方法:选取本院神经外科2013年1月2015年1月收治的96例HICH 患者进行回顾性分析,其中46例患者采用微创置管引流术治疗(微创组)、50 例患者采用开颅血肿清除术治疗(开颅组),对比两组患者的治疗效果及预后 差异。结果:微创组和开颅组患者术前、术后第Id的Vm、PI值差异无统计学意 义,术后第3d、第7d微创组患者的Vm值显著的高于开颅组、PI显著低于开颅 组;微创组和开颅组患者术前GCS评分值差异无统计学意义,术后第1周、2周 微创组患者的GCS评分值显著的高于开颅组;微创组预后良好24例(52.17%)显 著的高于开颅组的16例(32.00%);微创组的手术并发症率23.91%显著的低于 开颅组的40. 00%o结论:微创置管引流术治疗HICH患者效果可靠,术后并发症 较少,有利于患者的预后。 关键词 微创置管引流术;高血压脑出血;开颅血肿清除术;预后; 刘志刚,E-ma订:1175102544@qq. com 2017-09-16 Observation of the effect and prognosis of minimally invasive catheter drainage in the treatment of HICH patients Liu Zhi-gang Li Hua Zhang Liang-jun Zhang Xian-qi Yuan Xing Tian Gang The Fourth Peoples Hospital of Shaanxi; Abstract Objective To investigate the cl inical effect of minimal 1y invasive dra in age in the t rca tment of hyper tensive int racerebral hemorrhage (IIICII) and its effec t on the prognosis of patie nts. Met hods Selected neurosurgery hospital in January 2013 January 2015 were treated 96 cases HICH were retrospectively analyzed, of which 46 patients were treated with minimally invasive catheter drainage treatment (minimally invasive group) 、 50 patients were treated with hematoma disscction treatment (craniotomy group) , compared to treatment and prognosis between the two groups of patients. Results Former patients undergoing craniotomy group and minimally invasive group, the postoperative 1 d of Vm, PI values no sig ni fica nt di f fere nee, postoperative 3 d, Vm value at 7 d the minimally invasivc group were significantly higher than the open cranial group, PI was significantly lower than craniotomy group; the former group and patients undergoing minimally invasive craniotomy group GCS score was no significant differenee, after 1 week, 2 weeks minimally invasive GCS scores of patients was significantly higher than the eraniotomy group; good prognosis 24 cases of invasive group (52. 17%) was signifiedntly higher tha

文档评论(0)

ggkkppp + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档