Unity和UE4开发VR的优劣.docxVIP

PAGE1 / NUMPAGES1 轻量级，安装、调试和打包方便 配置VR项目十分简单 学习成本低，文档完善 开发成本低 UI系统 在PS4上调试方便，有批处理文件可以一键运行 Asset Store 提供了一些VR下的Demo作为参考 Unity的劣势： 内建工具不够完善 渲染差，光照系统糟糕，阴影bake有bug，只能勉强达到2A游戏入门水平对于控制器支持较差，一些如手柄震动、VR控制器空间定位的功能引擎未集成，需要第三方插件或额外代码 没有材质编辑器，需要第三方插件 Prefab不支持继承 没有xx的Level Stream支持 Unreal的优势： 画面效果完全达到3A游戏水准 光照和物理渲染即便在缩水的状况下也足以秒杀Unity xx系统，从此策划不用再写代码 强大的材质编辑器 各种官方插件xx 对于手柄、VR控制器支持良好 提供各种游戏模版，用来做原型配合Blueprint甚至比Unity更快 Unreal的劣势： C++ 如果要开发PS4游戏需要重新编译引擎，12核服务器，24线程编译大概需要20-30分钟 如果需要重新编译引擎，光拉代码就需要至少一个小时 创建新项目大概又要编译十多分钟 如果切换平台，要编译几千到上万个shader PS4部署不方便，打包编译同样非常久 学习成本高，各子模块功能强大但操作复杂 部分功能没有任何文档，已有功能的文档同样不够完善，不如Unity 开发成本高，某国内3A团队做了个10分钟的VR Demo，据说已经烧了一千多万UI设计器非常之难用 VR下的一些best practice同样缺乏文档和例子，目前都在摸石头过河Buuuuuuuuuuug 我觉得写了这么多结论已经很明显了： 小团队没钱追求快速出效果，对画面要求不高的项目用Unity。 中大团队不差钱，买得起Unreal技术支持，分工明确有专人填坑，对画面要求高的项目用Unreal。 这里还有一篇老外写的关于Unity和Unreal的文章，建议阅读： ExtroForge The Switch from Unity 3D to Unreal Engine A High Level Decision Let me start off by saying that I (and other team members) are still HUGE fans of Unity. Several of us on the team have been using Unity since v3.X days (including Pro licenses) and CONTINUE to use it for various projects. If I was starting a mobile project today, I would still reach for Unity.We made a LOT of progress on protyping ExtroForge with the Unity engine.Huge swaths of gameplay elements were engineered and integrated. We thrived with the rich variety of Asset Store packages available to us as well as the YEARS of online posts, blogs and tutorials. With at least two 15-yearsoftware engineering professionals on the team,we were efficient and proficient under Unity. image08 The first iteration was less than impressive.Extremely limited (missing?)documentation and oddball (buggy? flaky?) performance. Simple replication of an animated model (location/rotation)was either non-functional or super-laggy. We experimented. We read forum posts. We waited.There were no official Unity tutorials. Some of the people that WERE making tutorial videos that we followed actua