虚拟财产纠纷解决思路探讨.pdfVIP

摘要 2017年3月 15 日，《中华人民共和国民法总则》颁布，其中第 127条对虚 拟财产做了规定，将其认可为民事权利的一种。但是，法律并没有规定虚拟财产 到底属于何种民事权利，在制定民法总则的过程中一度倾向于将虚拟财产作为物 权的客体，可是由于其法律属性的特殊性，最后仍无法下定结论到底属于何种权 利。本文运用案例研究和理论分析的方法，对虚拟财产的法律属性和实务中产生 的主要问题进行了分析，发现国内目前对虚拟财产的研究存在着一些逻辑上的错 误，造成这些错误的主要原因在于没有弄清为何要将虚拟财产纳入法律保护的范 围，没有从纠纷的解决思路着手，而是单纯的对一个新事物进行理论上的分析。 虚拟财产不属于现有法律体系中任何一种权利，而是一种新型的财产权，但是目 前的虚拟财产还未发展到需要创设一个完整的权利概念，现有的法律体系仍然能 够适用于虚拟财产的保护，建议将研究的重点从讨论虚拟财产的权利归属转移到 虚拟财产纠纷的解决思路上来，从当前的情况来看，可以对用户协议的内容进行 立法，规定部分强制性条款。待虚拟财产发展到新的阶段形成了独立且完整的概 念再进行归属讨论。 关键词：虚拟财产，物权，债权 I Abstract On March 15, 2017, the general principles of the civil law of the Peoples Republic of Chinawaspromulgated, in which article 127provides for therecognition of virtual property as a kind of civil right.However, the law does not stipulate what kind of civil rights virtual property belongs to. In the process of formulating the general provisions of the civil law, virtual property was once inclined to be regarded asthe object ofreal right.However, due tothe particularity of its legal attributes, it is stillunabletomakeup itsmindwhatkind ofrightsitbelongsto.ThisarticleUSESthe method of case study and theoretical analysis on the legal attribute of virtualproperty and the main problems in practice are analyzed, found that the current domestic research on virtualproperty has some error in logic,the main causes ofthese errorsis not clear why willbe included in the scope of legal protection of virtualproperty,not start from the solution of the dispute, but simply on a theoretical analysis of a new things.Virtual property doesnot belong to any rights in the existing legal system, it is anew type ofproperty rights,but the current development ofvirtualproperty isnot to need to create a complete concept of rights, the existing legal system are still able to apply totheprotection ofvirtualproperty,the focus ofthepropose