行政裁量自我规制研究.pdfVIP

论 文 摘 要 行政裁量权可以追溯到行政权诞生的那一刻，人们总习惯于将行政裁量权视 为洪水猛兽，视为侵犯人们自由公平权益的罪魁祸首。然而事实却是，我们无法 将行政裁量权挡在行政这扇大门之外，更无法消灭它。现代政府的高运转高效率 要求行政裁量权的存在。于是剩下的问题是如何约束裁量权并纳入法治轨道。本 文在以立法统制和司法统制等传统控制方式为代表的外部控制体系基础上，着重 从行政自我规制的角度对该问题加以分析。 本文分为三部分：第一章节中主要对行政裁量权本身进行释义，明确其社会 必要性。重新打造行政裁量权在行政过程和法治进程中的地位。对有关概念进行 梳理和明确。第二部分中，笔者着重从内部裁量的角度加以分析，分别从理论和 实证的角度，点明传统外部控制方式的缺陷。同时明确行政内部规制的概念、行 事方式等实际性问题。并从我国地方立法的实际出发并作出分析。第三部分则从 行政内部规制的角度，为我国未来行政裁量权的发展和约束提供方案，以指明其 可能性发展路径。 关 键 词 ： 行政裁量权 行政自我规制 控制 制约 ABSTRACT Ever since the moment of the birth of the administrative power, came the administrative discretion. People were more likely to see administrative discretion as an evil which will definitely invade or breach people’s right of freedom and fairness. But the truth is we will never get rid of administrative discretion as long as the administration exists, not mention to destroy or eliminate it. Furthermore, modern government requires the administrative discretion to ensure the efficiency. Thus the remaining question for us is how to restrict and control the administrative discretion by the rule of law. The writer makes efforts to analyze and solve the problem, by abandoning traditional view of external control module exemplified by legislation and judicial control, converting to a newly- emerging point of view of self-regulation. The article constitutes of three parts: The first chapter aims to define administrative discretion and the role it plays to the society as a whole, reconstruct its image in people’s mind within the administrative process under the realm of law as well. In the second part, writer tries to drop more attribution on self-regulation, by pointing out its theoretical basis and listing out practical instance as well. In the