环境行政诉讼原告资格之探析.pdfVIP

论 文 摘要 近些年我国环境公益诉讼逐渐被人们所熟知，但环境公益诉讼中起诉难、案 件少等现状仍折射出现实环境公益诉讼制度的缺位。环境行政诉讼尤其如此。此 种现象的产生，多数源于现行行政诉讼法对原告资格的严格设定。无论是原告种 类、利益客体，还是因果关系，现有立法的相关实在法规范是基本无法适用于环 境行政诉讼原告资格认定过程中的。美国和日本的环境行政诉讼，都是战后经济 大发展时期的产物，两者有着较多的相似性。关于环境行政诉讼原告资格的认定 规则，本文主要以美国环境行政诉讼确立的 “事实受损”标准和日本环境行政诉 讼中的 “相当因果关系”为研究对象。在研究上述两种立法、判例与相关理论发 展的基础上，以立法模式为前提，提出了以下几点关于环境行政诉讼原告资格扩 张的具体构想。即原告种类和范围之认定、环境行政不作为之探讨、环境公共利 益之区分对待以及相当因果关系的创新等等。 关键词：环境行政诉讼，环境公共利益，原告资格 5 ABSTRACT In recent years, more and more Chinese become familiar with the litigation for environmental public interest, however, the fact that it is hard to launch this litigation and there are few litigations of this kind shows the vacancy of the system of the litigation for environmental public interest in reality. And this kind of vacancy is more apparent in the administrative litigation of environment. The major reason for this phenomenon is that the standing has been rigidly set in the present Administrative Litigation Law. The relevant positive law in the present legislation can not adapt to determining the standing whether from the plaintiff type, interest object or casual connection. The administrative litigation of environment in the USA and Japan was formulated under the circumstances of post-war economic development and shared some similar traits. Concerning the rule to determine the standing in the administrative litigation of environment, the present thesis focuses upon the “injury in fact” standard set in the American administrative litigation of environment