- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
成都中医药大学硕士学位论文
中文摘要
目的:探讨运用仙灵骨葆胶囊联合密盖息治疗老年性骨质疏松症的
临床疗效及其安全性。
方法:采用随机对照试验设计,将临床确诊的老年性骨质疏松症患
者92例分为研究组46例和对照组46例,2组均每日常规口服钙剂(钙
尔奇D、迪巧等)。对照组使用密密盖息肌注,研究组在上述治疗基
础上加服仙灵骨葆胶囊。用药8周后评定2组骨痛程度及相关检测指
标的变化,并详细记录不良反应发生的情况。
结果:研究组与对照组治疗老年性骨质疏松症的总有效率分别为
93.18 % 和 95.65 % (PO.05) , 不 良 反 应 发 生 率 为 13.04% 和
32.61%(P0.05);治疗前后,疼痛强度两组自身比较(P0.05),治
疗 后 组 间 比 较 (PO.05) ; 两 组 治 疗 后 骨 密 度 的 改 善 程 度 比 较
(P0.05)。
结论:中西医结合治疗老年性骨质疏松症所致的骨痛疗效确切,能
有效缓解骨质疏松性腰背疼痛,并可提高患者的骨密度,有利于改
善老年人的生活质量,且不良反应少,是一种安全而有效的方法。
关键词
老年性骨质疏松症;仙灵骨葆胶囊;密盖息;中西医结合
2
成都中医药大学硕士学位论文
ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xianlinggubao capsule plus
Miacalcic for Senile Osteoporosis.
Methods: Under the random and contrast research method, 92 cases were involved
in this trial and divided randomly into two groups (Research group and Control
group): the research group(n=46) were treated by xianlinggubao capsule and salmon
of calcitonin injection, while the control group(n=46) were treated only by the
salmon of calcitonin injection. All the patients received the calcium(Caltrate D,
D-Cal and so on) orally in equal quantity. After the treatment for 8 weeks, the nature
and degree of ostealgia in all the patients were assessed,and the related outcome
indexes were measured and the adverse drug reactions were recorded in detail.
Results: There were no significant differences between the research group and the
control group in total effective rates(95.65% for research group vs. 93.18% for
control group, P0.05), While significant differences were noted across the 2 groups
in the incidences of adverse drug reactions(13.04% and 32.61%, respectively,
P0.05); There was no significant differences in the degree of pain remission after
the treatment(P0.05), However, Both research group and control group were
decreased significantly in the degrees of ostealgia after treating(P0.05). Compared
with the control group, the bone density were increased significantly in the research
group after treating(P0.05).
Conclusions: The tre
文档评论(0)