小切口微创胆总管探查术安全性及临床护理分析评估.docVIP

小切口微创胆总管探查术安全性及临床护理分析评估.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小切口微创胆总管探查术安全性及临床护理分析评估   【摘 要】目的:系统评价小切口胆总管探查术的安全性,总结临床护理经验。方法:采用随机对照方法,分别对120例小切口和100例传统切口行胆总管探查术的患者,就术中意外伤、术后并发症、残留结石、术后一般情况和护理资料等进行对比分析,并总结护理经验和措施.结果:术后下床活动时间以及住院、术后肛门排气和禁食等时间,小切口组(MCE组)均少于传统切口组(OCE组);术后血浆管引流量,MCE组亦少于OCE组,两组的T管引流量统计无显著性差异;小切口组术中意外损伤发生率1.67%(2/120),术后结石残留率3.33%(4/120),结石复发率为5.00%(6/120);传统切口组术中意外损伤发生率2.00%(2/100),术后结石残留率为3.00%(3/100),结石复发率为5.00%(5/100),统计显示两组无显著性差异(p0.05);小切口组术后发生并发症8例,传统组8例,两组比较无统计学差异(p0.05);术后MCE组临床恢复明显较OCE快,两组比较有统计学差异(p0.05)。结论:小切口胆道探查手术是一种安全、有效、预后良好、恢复时间快的手术方式,密切观察T管,血浆管引流,及早发现并发症的发生,及早处理是关键。   【关键词】胆道探查;小切口;意外损伤;结石残留;护理   [Abstract]objective: To evaluate the safety, feasibility , curative effect and to conclude the nursing experience by mini-incision exploration of common bile duct. Methods In this study, 120 patients underwent min-incision exploration of common bile duct and 100 patients underwent open-incision exploration of common bile duct for suffering from bile duct stones and(or) gallstones from 2009 to 2010, and the iatrogentic bile duct injury, postoperative complication, residual stone, stone recurrence, therapeutic effect and nursing clinical data were evaluated with randomized contrast analysis. Results Time of operation, bleeding, volume of drain pipe, time of recover intestinal peristalsis and average days in hospital in the group of min-incision exploration(MCE)were less than that of open-incision exploration(OCE). The iatrogentic bile duct injury occurred in 2 cases (1.67%,2/120), residual stone in 4 cases (3.33%,4/120), stone recurrence in 6 cases(5.00%,6/120) in the group of MCE, and occurred in 2 cases(2.0%, 2/100), 3 cases(3.0%, 3/100)and 5 cases respectively in the group of OCE, there were less difference in the two groups. However, Postoperative complications occurred in the group of MCE and OCE was 8 cases(6.7%) and 8 cases(8.0%) respectively, and there was more difference in the two groups. Conclusion mini-incision exploration of common bile duct was a feasible and safe method resulting in fewer co

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档