烤烟和白肋烟及香料烟抗旱能力的比较研究.pdfVIP

第 31卷第 1期 2005年 2月 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版) Journal ofHunan Agricultural University(Natural Sciences) v01．3l No．1 Feb．2005 文章编号：Io07．1032(2o05)01．0015．05 烤烟和白肋烟及香料烟抗旱能力的比较研究 周冀衡 ’，王 勇 ，毛建华。，杨虹琦 ’，朱列书 ’ (1．湖南农业大学 烟草科学与工程技术重点实验室，湖南 长沙 410128；2．常德卷烟厂 技术中心烟草研究所，湖 南 常德 415000；3．湖南中烟工业公司 科技部，湖南 长沙 410007) 一 摘 要：为了在生产中选择抗旱性较强的品种提供理论依据，在研究了水分胁迫下烤烟、自肋烟、香料烟抗旱能 力的同时，还对干旱胁迫下烟草不同部位叶片的伸展速度、茎高、茎围、叶片萎蔫状况、复水后叶姿恢复能力等 抗旱生物学指标和烟叶含水量、叶绿素含量、根系活力、细胞膜透性等生理指标进行了系统研究．结果表明：香 料烟(沙姆逊种)的抗旱性最强，烤~(NC89)次之，自肋烟(自肋 21)的抗旱性较差．对有关抗旱指标比较表明：生物 学指标以第 3叶伸长速率对干旱较敏感，用于抗旱鉴定效果较好，而用萎蔫状况来判断烟草抗旱性则需要长时间 的观察．生理指标中以叶片含水量变化较为敏感，叶绿素含量和细胞膜透性也是判断烟草抗旱性的敏感指标，对 下部烟叶进行抗旱生理指标鉴定更为有效． 关 键 词：烤烟；自肋烟；香料烟；抗旱能力；评价指标 中图分类号：$572．0l 文献标识码：A The Comparison Research on Ability of Fought a Drought by the Flue—cured Tobacco，Burley Tobacco and Oriental Tobacco ZHOU Ji．heng ，WANG Yong2， MAO Jian．hua ，YANG Hong．qi‘，ZHU Li~shu‘ (1．Research Centre ofTobacco Engineering and Technology，Changsha 410128，China；2．Technology Center ofChangde Cigare~e Factory，Changde Hunan 415000，China；3．Technology Section ofTobacco Industry Corporation in Hunan ， Changsha 410007，China) Abstract：This text makes the appraisal evaluation to the ability of fought a drought flue·cured tobacco，burley tobacco and oriental tobacco．The results indicate that the ability of fighting a drought to the oriental tobacco(Samsum)is the strongest，the flue·cured tobacco(NC89)is taken second place，and burley tobacco (Burley 21)is worse．The comparison research on quota of fight a drought makes clear that stretching speed with the 3rd tobacco leaf in the biology quota is more sensitive to drought and appmisal efect used to fight a drought is beRer．With the wilting condition to judge the ability offight a drought in tobacco plant needs the observation oflong time．The change with the tobacco leafwater content in the physiology quota is comparatively sensitive．Chlorophyl content and cel membrane permeability also is sensitive quota to the arid．It is more efective that the analysis of physio