论意思表示错误的法律行为之效力.pdfVIP

西南交通大学学报(社会科学版) 2016 年3 月 JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY Mar. 2016 第 17 卷第2 期 (Social Sciences) Vo l. 17 No.2 论意思表示错误的法律行为之效力 潘运华1 ，张中成2 (1.华东政法大学法律学院，上海 200042; 2. 北京大成(福州)律师事务所，福建福 州I 350002) 关键词: 意思表示错误;法律行为;行为人;表意人;比较法学;私法;民法通则;合同法 摘 要: 意思表示作为法律行为之本质属性，是决定法律行为效力的根本因素。当意思表示主观层面的效 果意思或客观层面的外部表示出现错误时，其对相应法律行为之效力会产生一定的影响。传统民法中有规定意思 表示错误的法律行为之效力为可撤销，有规定其为无效，实务中还有通过意思表示解释得出其依然有效的结论。 为了平衡法律行为双方当事人的利益，保护交易安全，我国未来民法典宜原则上规定意思表示错误的法律行为之 效力为可撤销，同时明确意思表示解释在判断其效力上的优先性。 中图分类号: 四13 文献标志码: A 文章编号: 1009 -4474(2016)02 -0125 -08 Effects of Legal Acts in Which the Declaration of the Intent is Wrong I 2 PAN Yun-hua , ZHANG Zhong-cheng ( 1. Law School ,East China University of Political Science αnd Law ,Shanghαi 200042 , China; 2. Beijing Dαcheng (Fuzhou) Law Q庐ce ,Fuzhou F;吨lLαn 350002) Key words: declaration with wrong intent; legal acts; actor; representor; comparative law; private law; General Principles of the Civil Law; Contract Law Abstract: Declaration of the intent , the essential attribute of legal acts , determines the effectiveness of legal act as a fundamental factor. When there is an eπor in effect meaning or external expression of the declaration of the intent , the effect of corresponding legal acts will therefore produce certain effect. With regard to the effect of legal acts of wrongly expressed meaning , the traditional civil law has a regulation that it is revocable or invalid. In addition , it is considered effective occasionally by interpre