cadaveric assessment of synthetic mid-urethral sling placement尸体的评估合成mid-urethral吊索的位置.pdfVIP

Open Journal of Urology, 2011, 1, 19-24 doi:10.4236/oju.2011.12006 Published Online May 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/oju) Cadaveric Assessment of Synthetic Mid-Urethral Sling Placement Scott Serels Bladder Control Center of Norwalk,Norwalk CT, USA E-mail :scottserels@ Received March 5, 2011; revised April 25, 2011; accepted May 5, 2011 Abstract Purpose: To determine if 3 types of mid-urethral synthetic slings are visually the same. Materials and Methods: A retropubic, obturator, and single incision sling was individually placed in three cadavers. Tension was set using a spacer (obturator and retropubic). Single incision sling (SIS) tension was set by visual inspection. Thirty physicians were asked to determine placement method, tension, and location of the 3 slings. Results: Physicians were composed of 5 urolo- gists, 7 urogynecologist, and 18 general gynecologists, with an average of 53 slings performed per year. Conclusions: This study showed that after placement of a sling it is hard to tell how the sling was placed and that most physicians felt the SIS was tensioned the best and most likely at the mid-urethra. Retropubic Obturator SIS % correctly identified sling 40% 43% 23% % thought tension was just right 33% 47% 73% % thought sling was at mid-urethra 50% 67% 83% Keywords: Stress Incontinence, Surgical Correction of Incontinence, Si