on the difference between classroom teaching of mathematics（在数学课堂教学的区别）.docVIP

On the difference between classroom teaching of mathematics Abstract: Students in the physical development and psychological characteristics of the differences is an objective reality, and the love interest in mathematics, mathematical knowledge and acceptance of differences is an objective reality. With the reduction of high-quality students in rural schools, the quality of students is uneven, this is bound to have a negative impact on the teaching of mathematics, if the teaching is still a ‘one size fits all’ will fail for all students. take good care of individual differences of students, it can not properly implement the ‘individualized’ principle, not conducive to the full development of students, or even a serious polarization, which does not meet the requirements of quality education. the face of these realities, in mathematics teaching with differentiated instruction in the theory of the pilot to guide our teaching. Keywords: differentiated instruction differentiated instruction math class stratification With the reduction of high-quality students in rural schools, with the higher level, must be balanced placement, leading to rural school students in the same classroom, the uneven quality, large differences in academic performance, significant differences in mathematics teaching will bring considerable difficulties while teaching a class in the content, progress must be the same, if not the implementation of differentiated instruction is bound to make good students can not learn the full development of skills, poor progress of the students forced exhausted, leading to a higher level of students’ enough to eat ‘low-level students’ eat. ‘This resulted in a higher-level students feel that teachers teach too easy and too slow, dull look in the classroom, doing nothing, while lower-level students was on teaching the content is too difficult and the speed too fast, not to mention the interest to learn, over time, they produced a ‘weariness’ of the idea.