叶适功利哲学分析-an analysis of ye shis utilitarian philosophy.docx

下载文档 降价啦

2
0
约11.28万字
约 131页
2018-06-03 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

叶适功利哲学分析-an analysis of ye shis utilitarian philosophy.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

叶适功利哲学分析-an analysis of ye shis utilitarian philosophy

answerthechallengeoftheworldandfurtherdevelop.TheYongJiaschool’sappearisatthebackgroundoftheeconomyoftheSouthZheJiangprovincehasdevelopedextremelyfastandLuXueschoolhasbeenintroducedintoduetothegovernmentmovingintotheSouth.Fromtheorigin9scholartoXueJixuan,ChenFuliang,YongJiaschool’stheory,fromthepointofviewasaschool,iswasnotshapedyet.ButuptoYeShi,itbecamealocalschoolthatZhuXiverymuchconcernedon.atthistimefromthepointofviewasasystemictheory,itwasalthoughnotperfect,butYeShihasalreadyaccomplishedthesystemicconstructiononthetheoryofbenefitandrighteousnessbyusingthetraditionalideal,corespirit,systemiclanguage.HestartedfromBookofchange,hedeniedthetheoryaboutitwasmadebyConfucian,ratherthandeemedonlysmallpartofthebookwasdonebyConfucian,andthenhedenythetheoryabout“EightTrigramswasdonebyFuXi”“Developto64Trigrams”.andfinallygotaconclusionthat“rationisfromTrigram”.onthefoundationoflegalizedhistheory,hefurtheraddressthearrangementofhis“Tao”,HeseparatedTaoinConfucianismfromtheaffectionbyBuddhismandTaoism,pointout“HeavenhasitsTao,whilehumanhasitsown”.Thustofreepeoplefromthetranscendentastrict,promotepeople’srationalability.Basedonthis,hediscussionthemoveandpeaceon“attribute”,analyzingdifferentlyfromtraditionalConfucianismabouttheoriginof“false””emotion”.Onthismetaphysicbase,heprovedtherationabouttheseekingofbenefit.Ontheotherhand,althoughYeShihasfreedhuman’srationfromtheastrictoftranscendentideal,theworkwasnotthorough.Becauseoftherestrictoftimesandidealismitself.HeagainwenttobacktothelanguageconstructionofConfucianismconstantlytoseekarelationbetweentherationandtranscendentideal.Sothediscussiontheconceptionof“Imperatorialism”“neutralization”,whichisaactuallyatheoryofnoumenon.Inthishistoricnoumenontheory,itisaverymixtureofideal,institute,conception.Butduetotheintangibletheoryofnoumenon,makeithardtounderstandhistheoryof“innerHoly”.Andduetothefaintlyandincompletelyconstructedonthetheoryofnoumenon,whenhistheorygoestothearrangementofepistemology,hisTheoryon“BacktoCeremony”didnotgainanyfo