PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理应用及评价.docVIP

PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理应用及评价.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理应用及评价

PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理应用及评价   【摘要】 目的 探讨PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理的应用及效果评价。方法 选取斗门地区基层医院在职医护人员400例作为观察对象, 调查分析其手卫生现况, 应用PDCA循环在基层医院进行手卫生管理及评价, 并根据调查结果制定干预措施并实施。比较干预前后医护人员手卫生问卷正确率、手卫生执行率、洗手规范率及手部细菌携带率。结果 医院感染和手卫生状况调查结果显示, 干预后医护人员对手卫生问卷正确率从干预前的47%提高到87%, 手卫生执行率从干预前的37%提高到82% , 洗手规范率从干预前的33%提高到91% , 手部细菌携带率从干预前的26%下降到16% , 比较差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=144.731、168.067、285.569、12.055, P0.05)。结论 PDCA循环在基层医院手卫生管理的应用, 可提高本地区医务人员手卫生依从性, 提高本地区医院感染管理水平, 达到最终降低医院感染率的目标。   【关键词】 PDCA循环;基层医院;手卫生;效果评价   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.08.097   【Abstract】 Objective To investigate application and evaluation of effect by PDCA circulation for hand hygiene management in primary hospital. Methods A total of 400 medical staff in primary hospital of Doumen district as study subjects received investigation and analysis of their current hand hygiene situation. PDCA circulation was applied in hand hygiene management and evaluation in primary hospital, followed by establishment and implement of intervention measures in accordance with investigation outcomes. Comparison was made on hand hygiene questionnaire accuracy in medical staff, hand hygiene implementation rate, hand washing standard rate and had bacterial carrying rate before and after intervention. Results Investigation outcomes of nosocomial infection and hand hygiene showed increased hand hygiene questionnaire accuracy in medical staff from 47% before intervention to 87% after intervention, hand hygiene implementation rate from 37% before intervention to 82% after intervention, hand washing standard rate from 33% before intervention to 91% after intervention, and had bacterial carrying rate from 26% before intervention to 16% after intervention. The differences all had statistical significance (χ2=144.731, 168.067, 285.569, 12.055, P0.05). Conclusion Implement of PDCA circulation for hand hygiene management in primary hospital can enhance hand hygiene compliance in local medical staff and improve infection management degree in local hospital to achieve g

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档