- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
一次麻醉胃肠镜联合检查在老年患者中临床应用价值探讨
一次麻醉胃肠镜联合检查在老年患者中的临床应用价值探讨
[摘要] 目的 探讨分析在老年患者的消化系统检查中实施一次麻醉胃肠镜联合检查的临床效果。 方法 选取2012年8月~2013年10月实施消化道胃肠镜检查的老年患者156例,随机分为观察组与对照组,观察组患者实施一次麻醉下胃肠镜联合检查,对照组按照临床常规分别进行胃镜与肠镜检查,对比观察两组患者临床效果。 结果 观察组总检查时间短于对照组,应用麻醉药物总量少于对照组,患者满意度显著高于对照组,呛咳发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而心血管事件、呼吸事件发生率两组患者没有明显差异(P>0.05)。 结论 在老年患者临床检查中开展一次麻醉胃肠镜联合检查,能够缩短检查时间,减少麻醉药物用量,减少呛咳发生,患者检查更为方便,满意度明显提高,且不会引起心血管、呼吸事件增多,具有良好的临床应用效果及安全性。
[关键词] 老年;胃肠镜检查;联合;一次麻醉
[中图分类号] R614#8195;#8195;#8195;[文献标识码] B#8195;#8195;#8195;[文章编号] 2095-0616(2014)11-205-03
Discussion of the clinical value of a combined gastrointestinal endoscopy under single-dose anesthesia for elderly patients
ZHANG#8195;Xiying#8195;#8195;ZHANG#8195;Baoting#8195;#8195;CHEN#8195;Yibin
Endoscopy Centre, Shilong Peoples Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, Dongguan 523326,China
[Abstract] Objective To explore and analyze the clinical efficacy of a combined gastrointestinal endoscopy under single-dose anesthesia in the examination of gastrointestinal system for elderly patients. Methods 156 elderly patients who received gastrointestinal endoscopy from August 2012 to October 2013 were selected and randomly allocated to an observation group and a control group. The observation group received a combined gastrointestinal endoscopy under single-dose anesthesia, while the control group followed the clinical routine method and received gastroscope and intestinal endoscopy separately. Clinical efficacy between the two groups were compared and observed. Results Total examination time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, total dose of anesthetic drugs was fewer than that in the control group, patients satisfaction was significantly higher than that in the control group and the incidence of bucking was significantly lower than that in the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference of the incidence of cardiovascular and respiratory events between the two grou
文档评论(0)