- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
临床护理路径在脑卒中院前急救中应用探讨
临床护理路径在脑卒中院前急救中的应用探讨
【摘要】 目的:探讨临床护理路径在脑卒中患者院前急救护理中的可行性和临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2013年3-12月经抢救转运的53例脑卒中患者的临床资料,均实施常规护理,设为对照组。2014年1-11月本院脑卒中患者53例实施院前临床护理路径急救,设为观察组。采用洛杉矶院前卒中筛查量表筛查两组脑卒中患者,比较两组患者的接诊到抢救所需时间、抢救到接受专业治疗所需的时间、住院时间和死亡率。结果:观察组患者的平均接诊到抢救所需时间、抢救到接受专业治疗所需的时间和住院时间均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组生存47例(88.68%),死亡6例(11.32%);对照组生存39例(73.58%),死亡14例(26.41%),两组生存率比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:临床护理路径在脑卒中患者院前急救护理中是可行的,能指导院前急救,提高患者的生存率和有助预后。
【关键词】 临床护理路径; 脑卒中; 院前急救; 洛杉矶院前卒中筛查量表; 死亡率
Discussion on Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Pre-hospital Emergency Care of Cerebral Apoplexy/PENG Hai-jing,GUO Jia-hua,ZHONG Yu-hong,et al.//Medical Innovation of China,2015,12(12):084-086
【Abstract】 Objective:To study the feasibility and clinical effects of clinical nursing pathway in pre-hospital emergency care of patients with cerebral apoplexy.Method:A retrospective analysis was carried out on clinical information of 53 cases of patients with cerebral apoplexy, who were rescued and transported from March 2013 to December 2013.These 53 patients were given regular nursing and were assigned into the control group.53 cases of patients with cerebral apoplexy were given pre-hospital emergency care by clinical nursing pathway from January 2014 to November 2014.These 53 patients were assigned into the observation group.Los Angeles Pre-hospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS) was used to screen two groups of patients with cerebral apoplexy.The two groups of patients were compared in the duration from clinical reception to rescue, the duration from rescue to professional treatment, length of hospital stay and mortality.Result:Average duration from clinical reception to rescue, average duration from rescue to professional treatment and length of hospital stay in the observation group were all significantly shorter than those of the control group (P0.05).47 cases were survival (88.68%) while 6 cases (11.32%) died in the observation group.39 cases were survival (73.58%) while 14 cases (26.41%) died in the control
文档评论(0)