单侧拍背后吸痰法对机械通气患者临床研究.docVIP

单侧拍背后吸痰法对机械通气患者临床研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
单侧拍背后吸痰法对机械通气患者临床研究

单侧拍背后吸痰法对机械通气患者临床研究   【摘要】 目的:探讨机械通气患者采取单侧拍背后吸痰法的效果。方法:选取本院ICU住院的机械通气患者80例患儿作为研究对象,根据入院时间的不同将其均分为两组,每组各40例。对照组采取双侧拍背后吸痰法,试验组采取单侧拍背后吸痰法,观察比较两组患儿的拍背吸痰后痰鸣音消退率、血氧饱和度恢复时间、吸痰次数、吸痰累积时间、肺部感染率、住院时间。结果:试验组的拍背吸痰后鸣音消退率为90.00%,明显高于对照组的67.50%,差异有统计学意义( 字2=6.05,P0.05);试验组的肺部感染率为2.50%,明显低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义( 字2=4.51,P0.05)。试验组血氧饱和度恢复时间、吸痰累积时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组,吸痰次数明显少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:机械通气患者采取单侧拍背后吸痰法可缩短患者气管导管和呼吸机分离时间,确保持续不断与有效的供氧,安全性高,值得借鉴。   【关键词】 机械通气; 单侧拍背; 双侧拍背; 吸痰法   【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the effect of sputum suction method after unilateral pat on the back for patients with mechanical ventilation.Method:80 children with mechanical ventilation admitted ICU of our hospital were selected as research objects,they were divided into the two groups according to the different time of admission,40 cases in each group.The control group was taken sputum suction method after bilateral pat on the back,the experimental group was taken sputum suction method after unilateral pat on the back.The regression rate of wheezy phlegm after pat back and sputum suction,the recovery time of blood oxygen saturation,sputum suction times,sputum accumulation time,pulmonary infection rate and hospital stay between the two groups were observed and compared.Result:The regression rate of wheezy phlegm after pat back and sputum suction in the experimental group was 90.00%,which was significantly higher than 67.50% in the control group,the difference was statistically significant( 字2=6.05,P0.05).The pulmonary infection rate of the experimental group was 2.50%,which was significantly lower than 20.00% of the control group,the difference was statistically significant( 字2=4.51,P0.05).The recovery time of blood oxygen saturation,sputum accumulation time and hospital stay in the experimental group were significantly shorter than those in the control group,the sputum suction times of the experimental group was significantly less than that of the control group,the differences were statistically si

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档