常见头孢类抗生素体外抑菌活性研究.docVIP

常见头孢类抗生素体外抑菌活性研究.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
常见头孢类抗生素体外抑菌活性研究

常见头孢类抗生素体外抑菌活性研究   【摘要】 目的:对常见头孢类抗生素进行体外抑菌活性研究。方法:利用头孢氨苄、头孢唑啉、头孢呋辛、头孢替安、头孢他啶、头孢哌酮6种常见头孢类抗生素对我院临床分离的562株菌(革兰氏阳性菌206株,革兰氏阴性菌356株)进行体外活性检测。结果:头孢氨苄、头孢唑啉(1代)对革兰氏阳性菌的敏感率为93.2%、96.1%,对革兰氏阴性菌的敏感率为52.3%、55.1%;头孢呋辛、头孢替安(2代)对革兰氏阳性菌的敏感率为95.6%、97.1%,对革兰氏阴性菌的敏感率为75.3%、76.4%;头孢他啶、头孢哌酮(3代)对革兰氏阳性菌的敏感率为85.4%、87.4%,对革兰氏阴性菌的敏感率为90.2%、92.1%。1代、2代头孢类抗生素对革兰氏阳性菌的抑菌活性高于3代,而3代头孢类抗生素对革兰氏阴性菌的抑菌活性高于1代、2代,且差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);1代和2代对革兰氏阳性菌的抑菌活性差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:1代、2代头孢类抗生素体外抑制革兰氏阳性菌效果好于3代头孢,3代头孢体外抑制革兰氏阴性菌效果好于1代、2代。   【关键词】 头孢类抗生素;体外抑菌活性;革兰氏阳性菌;革兰氏阴性菌   【中图分类号】R963【文献标志码】 A【文章编号】1007-8517(2015)10-0018-02   Study of common cephalosporin antibiotics on the antibacterial activity in vitro   LI QiDENG ChenghuaYUAN WeifangXUE PingfangZHANG Tao   The Department of Pharmacy of the Third People’s Hospital in Longgang District of Shenzhen city, Guangdong 518115   Abstract:[WTHZ]Objective[WTBZ] To study the antibacterial activity in vitro of common cephalosporin antibiotics. [WTHZ]Methods [WTBZ] 562 strains of clinical isolates, 206 strains of gram positive bacteria and 356 strains of gram negative bacteria were selected in our hospital and the above bacterial strains were used to detect and compare the antibacterial activity in vitro of the common cephalosporin antibiotics (cephalosporin, ampicillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotiam, ceftazidime, cefoperazone). [WTHZ]Results[WTBZ] The sensitive rates of cefalexin and cefazolin (1 st generation) against gram positive bacteria were 93.2% and 96.1 ,The sensitivity rates of those medicines against gram negative bacteria were 52.3% and 55.1%. The sensitive rates of cefuroxime and cefotiam (2 rd generation) the gram positive bacteria were 95.6% and 97.1% while the sensitive rates of those medicines against the gram negative bacteria were 75.3% and 76.4%. The sensitive rates of ceftazidime and cefoperazone (3 rd generation) against the gram positive bacteria were 85.4% while87.4% while the sensitive rate of those medicines against the gram negative bacteria

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档