中美公允价值计量属性比较研究——基于中国新会计准则和美国sfas157号准则-a comparative study of fair value measurement attributes between china and america —— based on chinas new accounting standards and us sfas 157 standards.docxVIP

下载本文档

12
0
约5.18万字
约 50页
2018-09-07 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

中美公允价值计量属性比较研究——基于中国新会计准则和美国sfas157号准则-a comparative study of fair value measurement attributes between china and america —— based on chinas new accounting standards and us sfas 157 standards.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

中美公允价值计量属性比较研究——基于中国新会计准则和美国sfas157号准则-a comparative study of fair value measurement attributes between china and america —— based on chinas new accounting standards and us sfas 157 standards

II II Abstract On September 15, 2006, FASB issued the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.157 Notice (SFAS157) by the official press“the fair value measurement”, International Accounting Standards Committee has also stepped up to the pace of formulating uniform guidelines for the fair value measurement, and then issued a draft based on the SFAS157 .From all of that we can see the development of uniform guidelines for the fair value measurement has become a trend. With the continuous improvement of our overall national strength, Our position in the international is also growing. Although we have made some progress about setting the guidelines, the impact is still not enough. So we shouldn’t closely follow with the other behind, but should follow the trend and act quickly to find and solve problems from practice, get continuous progress and win more voice and influence.This is the meaning about the comparison of the criteria for the fair value measurement. There are two main parts about the comparative analysis in the article. One is the evolution of the fair value measurement criteria and the comparative between Sino-Us about the external factors of the environment and the scope of application. The other top priority research is the internal definition of the guidelines, the method of measurement of levels and disclosure. This article described in detail the time of confirming the fair value, the choice of the place, the advantages and disadvantages of recorded price and sells price, the overall view of market participants and so on. The article detailed comparative analysis of relevant policy recommendations put forward, and studies have found that the fair value measurement of the use and development is a systematic project, not only requires its own thorough development of the various aspects also need supporting facilities.The article hope our country can draw up the uniform fair value criteria as soon as possible and make it more operational, in line