干扰素联合索拉非尼治疗晚期肾癌临床效果及安全性评价.docVIP

干扰素联合索拉非尼治疗晚期肾癌临床效果及安全性评价.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
干扰素联合索拉非尼治疗晚期肾癌临床效果及安全性评价

干扰素联合索拉非尼治疗晚期肾癌临床效果及安全性评价   [摘要] 目的 探讨干扰素联合索拉非尼治疗晚期肾癌的临床效果及安全性评价。 方法 抽取2013年6月~2014年6月期间延安大学附属医院门诊收治的晚期肾癌患者72例。根据治疗方法的不同分为索拉非尼组和联合组,索拉非尼组患者42例,联合组患者30例。索拉非尼组患者给予索拉非尼连续用药方案,联合组患者在索拉非尼组的基础上加用干扰素,对比两组临床有效率、疾病控制率、无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS)、不良反应发生率。 结果 索拉非尼组患者中位PFS为16个月;部分缓解和稳定患者的中位PFS可以达28个月;有23例患者死亡,平均OS 12个月;1年生存率73.81%,2年生存率42.86%,3年生存率19.05%。联合组无疾病进展和死亡病例,疾病控制率100%;中位PFS为15个月。联合组临床有效率稍高于索拉非尼组,但差异无统计学意义(P 0.05);联合组的疾病控制率明显高于索拉非尼组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 索拉非尼对晚期肾癌的治疗效果较好,加入干扰素配合治疗不仅可以提高疾病缓解率,而且不增加毒副反应的发生率;两组患者出现的不良反应均可耐受,临床应用较为安全。   [关键词] 肾癌;晚期;索拉非尼;无进展生存期;缓解;毒副反应   [中图分类号] R737.11 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)06(c)-0161-04   [Abstract] Objective To discuss the clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma by using interferon combined with sorafenib. Methods 72 cases of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the Outpatient Department of Yanan University Affiliated Hospital from June 2013 to June 2014 were selected. According to the different treatment methods, 72 cases of patients were divided into sorafenib group and joint group. There were 42 cases of patients in the sorafenib group, while 30 cases in the joint group. The patients in the sorafenib group were treated with direct sorafenib, while those in the joint group received sorafenib combined with interferon. The clinical efficiency, disease control rate, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The median PFS of patients in the sorafenib group was 16 months. The median progression free survival of patients with partial remission and stability could be up to 28 months. There were 23 patients died in the sorafenib group and the mean OS was 12 months. The 1 year survival rate was 73.81%, the 2 year survival rate was 42.86% and the 3 year survival rate was 19.05% in the sorafenib group. There were no disease progression and death in the joint group. The median PFS of p

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档