翻转课堂联合微信公众平台在外科见习中设计与应用.docVIP

翻转课堂联合微信公众平台在外科见习中设计与应用.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
翻转课堂联合微信公众平台在外科见习中设计与应用

翻转课堂联合微信公众平台在外科见习中设计与应用   [摘要] 目的 探?翻转课堂教学法和微信公众平台在外科见习中的设计和应用效果。 方法 选择2017年3~5月在长海医院普外科见习的2014级五年制临床医学本科专业的90名学生为教学对象。按照随机数字表法将其分为两组,每组各45人。传统组采用传统教学法,教改组采用翻转课堂结合微信教学。比较两组理论和技能考试成绩。采用医教部专家设计的规范化问卷对两组的教学效果、学员能力、学习态度和学习方法、医学人文意识进行评价。 结果 两组理论成绩比较,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05)。两组技能操作考核中在爱伤观念、操作过程中的应变能力、操作步骤、操作的整体质量、无菌观念、无菌操作技术及记录书写方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05),而教改组在学习态度、操作准备情况及协作能力方面的成绩明显高于传统组(P 0.05)。教改组学生在理论知识的理解和记忆、学习的主动性和积极性、临床思维判断、理论结合实践应用、学习效率和学习氛围等方面优于传统组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 翻转课堂联合微信平台的教学模式在外科见习中切实可行,可更有效地提高教学效果,优于传统教学模式。   [关键词] 翻转课堂;微信公众平台;外科见习;教学效果   [中图分类号] G643 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2017)12(a)-0137-05   [Abstract] Objective To discuss the design and application effects of flipped classroom teaching method combined with WeChat public platform in surgical probation. Methods From March to May 2017, 90 medical undergraduates of the grade 2014 five-year clinical medicine undergraduate professional on probation in the Department of General Surgery of Changhai Hospital were enrolled as teaching objects and divided into the traditional group and the educational reform group by random number table, with 45 cases in each group. The traditional group was given traditional teaching methods and the educational reform group was given flipped classroom combined with WeChat teaching methods. The scores of theories and skills test were compared between the two groups. The standardized questionnaire designed by experts of the medical department was used to evaluate the teaching effect, learners ability, learning attitude and learning methods and the medical humanistic consciousness. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the scores of theoretical examination between the two groups (P 0.05). In the skill test, there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of love concept, strain capacity during operation, operation steps, overall quality of operation, aseptic concept, aseptic operation skill and record writing between the two groups(P 0.0

文档评论(0)

317960162 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档