艾米莉·狄金森与陶渊明诗的自然观比较-比较文学与世界文学专业论文.docxVIP

I I 艾米莉·狄金森与陶渊明诗的自然观比较 摘要：中西方在自然观问题上有着截然不同的认识，中国人认为自然万物是主 体的外化，在天人合一的境界中感悟人与自然的冥合。西方人在文明进程中强 调人类征服自然的崇高感，自然与个体无法达于圆融和谐。在东西方不同文化 背景之下，艾米莉·狄金森与陶渊明两位诗人有着相似却又不同的人生之旅与 解脱之路，他们的共鸣基于相似的生命体验，看破浮世的纷扰后，都选择隐匿 田园，在自然中找到心灵内在的超越。艾米莉·狄金森拒绝宗教对内心的侵蚀， 她对生命的本真存有最热切的渴望，对自然、人生与死亡等问题有着清醒而深 刻的思考，在自然中寻求当下真实的幸福；田园诗人陶渊明在人生的踌躇中选 择将人格理想重新建构于自然这个背景之上，实现自我生命的超越。陶诗所体 现的逸世高情深刻影响了后代诗人，也在中华文化史上开辟了一个新的篇章。 中西方不同的社会风貌及哲学思潮背景之下，狄金森与陶渊明各自选择了不同 的人生归途，陶渊明在平淡质朴的自然中获得人生的自在与逍遥，而狄金森在 自由灵魂的引领下探寻自然的奥义。他们都有着个体生命关于人生真相的理解， 让自我生命与自然坦诚相见,他们朴素平淡的诗文背后有着隽永淳厚的深意，在 历史长河中散发历久弥新的魅力，他们在人生之路上不断寻求内在的超越，在 自然的土壤里重植生命，在心灵与自然的和谐融合之中解决生死的矛盾，使真 实的生命在自然万物间自在安然。 关键词：自然、人生、矛盾、和谐 II II The Comparisons of views of nature in Emily Dickinson’s and Tao Yuanming’s poetry Abstract：Chinese and western world hold different understandings in views of nature, Chinese believe that nature is the externalization of the subject, feeling the harmony of the unity of nature and man. Westerner emphasizes the noble honor of coquesting nature in the process of civilization, individual and nature cannot reach the state of harmony. Under different cultural backgrounds between the east and the west, Emily Dickinson and Tao Yuanming had similar but different life journey and liberation road, their resonance based on the similar life experiences, they both chose to live in pastoral after seeing through the chaos in their society, and to find inner transcending in nature. Emily Dickinson refused to accept the inner erosion of religion, she had the most eager longing for the authenticity of life and deep thinking of nature, life and death, she sought for the real happiness in nature; Pastoral poet Tao Yuanming chose to reconstruct his dreams under the background of nature in the hesitated life and gained inner transcending. Poets of later generations were deeply influenced by the noble spirit in Tao’s poetry, Tao started a new chapter in Chinese cultural history. Chinese and the western world hold different social features and philosophy trends, Emily Dickinson