- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术研究
胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术研究
摘 要:目的 研究胃穿孔行修补术和胃大部切除术的临床疗效。方法 回顾分析2016年10月~2017年10月在我院治疗的90例胃穿孔患者临床资料,依据手术方法将其分为修补组和切除组,各45例。切除组采用胃大部切除术,修补组采用修补术,对比两组患者临床疗效。结果 修补组治疗总有效率与切除组对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);修补组手术时间、住院时间短于切除组,术中出血量少于切除组,并发症发生率低于切除组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);切除组复发率低于修补组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 胃修补术和胃大部切除术治疗胃穿孔均具有一定的疗效,修补术创伤小,手术时间短,出血量少,而切除术复发率低。两种手术方法各有优势,临床应依据患者具体情况合理选择。
关键词:胃穿孔;修补术;胃大部切除术
中图分类号:R656.61 文献标识码:A DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.034文章编号:1006-1959(2018)05-0103-02
Repair of Gastric Perforation and Subtotal Gastrectomy
ZHOU Jun
(Department of General Surgery,Zhongzang Hospital,Jiuzhaigou 623400,Sichuan,China)
Abstract:Objective To study the clinical effect of repair and subtotal gastrectomy for gastric perforation.Methods The clinical data of 90 patients with gastric perforation treated in our hospital from October 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the operative method,the patients were divided into two groups:the repair group and the resected group,45 cases each group.The resection group was treated with subtotal gastrectomy,and the repair group with the repair operation.Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups was made.Results There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the repair group and the resection group(Pgt;0.05),the operative time,the hospitalization time and the amount of intraoperative bleeding in the repair group were shorter than those in the resection group,and the incidence of complications was lower than that in the resection group,the difference was statistically significant(Plt;0.05).The recurrence rate in resection group was lower than that in repair group,the difference was statistically significant(Plt;0.05).Conclusion Gastric repair and subtotal gastrectomy are effective in the treatment of gastric perforation.They have advantages of less trauma,shorter operation time,less bleeding,and lowe
文档评论(0)