- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
胫骨远端骨折LISS术配合中药熏洗对踝关节功能恢复影响
胫骨远端骨折LISS术配合中药熏洗对踝关节功能恢复影响
[摘要] 目的 探讨胫骨远端骨折LISS术配合中药熏洗对踝关节功能恢复的影响。 方法 选取2012年1月~2014年1月期间我院接收治疗的108例胫骨远端骨折患者,所有患者均给予经皮微创钢板内固定(MIPPO)技术植入LISS钢板进行治疗。采用随机数表法将108例患者分为观察组和对照组,各54例。术后2周观察组患者予中药熏洗治疗。对比两组患者术后的临床疗效和功能评分情况。 结果 观察组患者的肿胀、功能和X线评分分别为(33.61±2.85)分、(16.13±2.34)分和(30.21±3.01)分,对照组患者的肿胀、功能和X线评分分别为(30.15±2.12)分、(12.21±1.68)分和(34.04±3.61)分。观察组患者的肿胀、功能和X线情况均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者的优良率为96.30%,对照组患者的优良率为81.48%,观察组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 采用LISS治疗胫骨远端骨折具有较好的临床疗效,术后恢复较快,同时术后结合中药熏洗治疗能够促进踝关节功能的恢复,可在临床上进一步推广和使用。
[关键词] 胫骨远端骨折;LISS术;中药熏洗;踝关节功能
[中图分类号] R683.42 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)14-0054-03
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effects of distal tibial fractures LISS combined with fumigation of chinese medicine on the recovery of ankle joint functions. Methods A total of 108 patients with distal tibial fractures who were admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 were selected. All patients were given the treatment of implanting LISS steel plate by MIPPO technology. 108 patients were assigned to an observation group and a control group according to the method of random number table, with 54 patients in each. Patients in the observation group were given fumigation of chinese medicine 2 weeks after the surgery. Clinical effects and function scores after the surgery were compared between the two groups of patients. Results Scores of swelling, functions and X-ray in the observation group were (33.61±2.85), (16.13±2.34), and (30.21±3.01) respectively. Scores of swelling, functions and X-ray in the control group group were (30.15±2.12), (12.21±1.68), and (34.04±3.61) respectively. Swelling, functions and X-ray in the observation group were all better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P0.05). The excellent and good rate in the observation group was 96.30%, while in the control group was 81.48%. Clinical effects in the observation group were better than those in the control group, and the
文档评论(0)