- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
腹腔镜胆道探查术对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效及安全性评价
腹腔镜胆道探查术对胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效及安全性评价
[摘要] 目的 探讨腹腔镜胆道探查术在胆囊结石合并胆总管结石治疗中的临床疗效及安全性。 方法 148例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者分别行胆囊管胆道探查术(胆囊管组,26例)、胆管切开胆道探查并胆总管一期缝合(一期缝合组,65例)和胆管切开胆道探查并胆总管T管引流术(T管引流组,57例),比较三组患者的手术情况、术后恢复情况及并发症发生情况。 结果 三组患者的手术时间(F=36.789,P0.01)、术中出血量(F=13.467,P0.01)、胃肠功能恢复时间(F=29.615,P0.01)、住院天数(F=39.610,P0.01)有显著差异;一期缝合组的手术时间(t=5.76,P0.01)、术中出血量(t=4.71,P0.01)、胃肠功能恢复时间(t=6.78,P0.01)、住院天数(t=9.94,P0.01)均小于T管引流组;住院费用高于T管引流组(t=15.78,P0.01)。 结论 经胆囊管途径的腹腔镜胆道探查术的临床疗效优于腹腔镜下胆管切开后一期缝合和T管引流术。
[关键词] 腹腔镜胆道探查术;胆囊结石;胆总管结石
[中图分类号] R657.4 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2014)32-0139-03
The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration for patients with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis
LI Minxian1 XING Renwei1 LU Baochun2
1.Department of General Surgery,Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province,Taizhou 318000,China;2.Department of General Surgery,Shaoxing Peoples Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing 312000, China
[Abstract] Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and operation safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration for patients with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods A total of 148 patients with both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were respectively performed the transcytic common bile duct exploration with choledochoscope (TCBDE) (TCBDE group, 26 cases), primary duct closure group (65 cases) and T-tube drainage (T-tube group, 57 cases), the operation situation, postoperative recovery and complications were observed among three groups. Results The operative time (F=36.789, P0.01), blood loss (F=13.467, P0.01), gastrointestinal function recovery time (F=29.615, P0.01), hospital stay (F=39.610, P0.01) of three group had significant difference; the operative time (t=5.76, P0.01), blood loss (t=4.71, P0.01), gastrointestinal function recovery time (t=6.78, P0.01), hospital stay (t=9.94, P0.01) of the primary duct closure group were less than the T-tube group; hospitalization costs were higher than T-tube drainage grou
原创力文档


文档评论(0)