- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
麻醉方式对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后恢复效果影响分析
麻醉方式对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后恢复效果影响分析
【摘要】 目的:对比分析全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后恢复效果的影响。方法:选取2011年2月-2013年4月笔者所在医院收治的50例高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为全身麻醉组和椎管内麻醉组,各25例。对两组患者术后并发症、住院时间及下地活动时间等恢复情况进行对比分析。结果:所有患者术中骨折部位得到较好的复位与固定。椎管内麻醉组发生术后并发症3例(12.0%),全身麻醉组术后并发症10例(40.0%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。此外椎管内麻醉组下地活动时间及住院时间明显优于全身麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:椎管内麻醉对患者术后恢复效果(术后并发症、下地活动所需时间及住院时间)影响优于全身麻醉组。麻醉方式对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后恢复效果有一定的影响,在采取PFNA髓内钉固定术治疗时,可优先选择椎管内麻醉方式。
【关键词】 全身麻醉; 椎管内麻醉; 股骨粗隆间骨折
中图分类号 R683.4 文献标识码 A 文章编号 1674-6805(2014)15-0014-03
The Influence of Anesthesia on the Postoperative Recovery Eldly Patients with Intertrochanteric Facture of Femur/LU Qun-ying,HUANG Xun.//Chinese and Foreign Medical Research,2014,12(15):14-16
【Abstract】 Objective:Comparative analysis of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for surgery among patients intertrochanteric fracture recovery effect of impact.Method:50 cases from February 2011 to April 2013,admitted in the hospital of intertrochanteric fracture in aged patients, using the random number table method which can be divided into general anesthesia group and spinal canal anesthesia group, 25 cases each. On two groups of patients with postoperative complications, the length of time and engaged in activities such as recovery were analyzed.Result:All of the patients got good reduction and fixation of intraoperative fracture position. Spinal canal anesthesia group of postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases(12.0%), 10 cases(40.0%) of postoperative complications of general anesthesia group,between the two groups there was statistically significant(P0.05). Moreover intra-spinal canal anesthesia group was obviously better than the down time and hospital stay general anesthesia group, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:Spinal canal anesthesia for patients with postoperative recovery effect(postoperative complications, and down time needed for activities and the length of time) effect is better than that of general anesthesia gr
文档评论(0)