房屋转租中次承租人权益保护分析-民商法学专业论文.docxVIP

secondly, it states the regulations of the lessees’ prior purchase rights in the house selling and buying, and points out the blank of current laws in the rights of subtenant; thirdly, it states that the changes of the houses’ proprietary rights do not break the lease of house, introduce the argument that, in academic circles, whether these rights suit the house-subletting or not, and point out the lack of legal provisions in disputing the rights in judicial practice. In the situation of unauthorized house-sublettings, this part analyses the legal consequences and the insufficiencies of current laws. There are no clear provisions in current laws about the validity of house-subletting contracts, which leads an argument in academic circles. In practice, different methods are used to solve this kind of disputation, which is obviously harmful to the subtenants’ interests. The third part states the improvement of protecting regulations in subtenants’ interests, and, at the same time, it is the starting point and end-result of this paper. Firstly, the rights of lessors and lessees’ terminating contracts should be limited through improving the standard of judicial practice and the law. Without subtenants’ agreements, conventions of terminating the house-leasing contracts are illegal. This part also mentions that it is necessary to establish the subtenants’ rights of objection, and states the theoretical basis of this right and the exercising patterns. Secondly, the law should make it clear that the subtenants have the prior purchase rights when the lessors selling their house. It explains the theoretical basis of the subtenants’ prior purchase rights through analyzing the lessees’ rights. The laws should make the order of the subtenants’ prior purchasing rights clear. However, based on the common principle that the subtenants’ prior purchasing rights should be in front of the lessees’, the order can be changed in different situations of house-subletting. In the situation o