交通肇事逃逸行为刑法合理规制研究刑事诉讼法专业论文.docxVIP

measures to prevent the risk of further expansion ofobligations. Third, according to different criteria, Traffic Accident behavior is divided into four different types. The title of the second part of the status quo and problems of the criminal regulation of Traffic Accident behavior. The contents of this section, the author will be divided into two aspects are discussed. The first is to analyze the status quo of Chinas Traffic Accident behavior criminal regulation Criminal and explain to deal with the specific provisions of the escape behavior. The second is to analyze the behavior criminal regulation in Traffic Accident in China, mainly four small parts: First, the analysis of the Criminal Code Traffic Accident Escaping Behavior inaccurate definition, does not meet its essence, Traffic Accident behavior essentially does not fulfill the obligation of assisting the wounded; Second, the interpretation of escape acts of complicity in the provisions of the traffic Accident common criminal provisions conflict with Chinas criminal Law; same time, it is pointed out that the escape behavior embedded in traffic Accident sin, both as punishment fits the crime and as punishment fits the crime, there are contradictory; Third, the traffic accident acts ancillary requirements in a traffic accident crime, making the evaluation of certain escape behavior is not criminal law; Fourth, to escape behavior affiliated to the the traffic crime confusing two acts of nature; fact they are qualitatively different behavior. The title of the third part of the Traffic Accident in China criminal law reasonable behavior regulation proposals. This section is mainly discussed from two aspects: Traffic Accident behavior criminal regulation mode selection and Traffic Accident in China acts of criminal law specific concept of reasonable regulation. First, select a few of the more typical extraterritorial national analysis of the escape behavior of criminal regulation on traffic accident, and generall