论自杀参与行为-法律·刑法学专业毕业论文.docxVIP

I I 论自杀的参与行为 中文摘要 论自杀的参与行为 中文摘要 在我国，自杀行为不是犯罪。出于对个人自己决定权的尊重，站在法益侵害说的 立场，法律应当承认自杀行为的合法性。在我国，教唆、帮助自杀等自杀参与行为同 样不是犯罪，但学界和司法实践中往往将自杀参与行为评价为故意杀人行为。应当将 自杀参与行为与故意杀人罪的实行行进行严格的区分，并且，根据我国目前学界普遍 接受和承认的共犯从属性理论，刑法也暂时无法对其进行合理地规制。考虑到生命的 处置权应当只属于个人，应当排斥他人的介入，且该行为是对社会秩序的严重破坏， 站在刑法家长主义的立场上，刑法应当处罚自杀参与行为。唯一能解决此矛盾的方法 是将自杀参与行为单独定罪，以保障处罚上的正当性、合理性以及量刑的精准性。 关键词：教唆自杀；帮助自杀；可罚性；独立定罪 作 者：钱明月 指导老师：李晓明 II II Abstract Researching on Suicide Participation Behavior Researching on Suicide Participation Behavior Abstract In China, the behavior of committing suicide is not belonging to the crime. Out of respect for the individual’s own decision, in the position of the theory of legal interest violation, the Law should admit the legality of the behaviors of committing suicide. In our country, the behavior of abetting, assisting suicide and some other relevant behavior of committing suicide also is not involved in the crime, however, in academic and judicial practice,the participation behavior will be evaluated to the behavior of intentional homicide. Relevant behaviors of committing suicide and behavior of intentional homicide should be strictly distinguished, moreover, according to our theory of accomplice subordinate which is accepted and admitted by academic, Criminal Law cannot be reasonably regulated temporarily. In consideration of dispose of the right to life only belongs to individual, it should be excluded of the involvement of others, the social order is severely damaged because of these behaviors, in the view of paternalism, relevant behaviors should be punished based on Criminal Law. The only method which can resolve this contradiction is that relevant behaviors should be convicted individually in order to guarantee the legitimacy, rationality and sentencing accuracy of penalization. Keywords: abetting suicide; assisting suicide; punishablility; convict individually Writen by Qian Mingyue Supervised by Li Xiaoming 目 录 引 言1 一、自杀参与行为的定性2 （一）自杀行为2 1. 自杀行为的社会学评价2 2. 自杀行为的法律评价3 3.