论我国法院变更指控罪名模式之选择与重构-法律专业论文.docxVIP

摘要1999年重庆虹桥一案在全国引发了法院变更指控罪名的热烈讨论，理论界 摘要 1999年重庆虹桥一案在全国引发了法院变更指控罪名的热烈讨论，理论界 与实务界纷纷发表文章表达自己的观点，基本形成两种观点，一种是支持法院直 接变更指控罪名；另一种则反对法院径行变更指控罪名，并提出改革方案：建议 借鉴英美法系的“实体限制型’’模式或大陆法系的“程序限制型”模式对我国法 院罪名变更模式进行改革。笔者对两种较为典型的两种罪名变更模式加以阐述， 并着重对其局限性做出分析。“实体限制型”模式由于实行严格的诉因制度，不 可避免会带来实体的不公，并且与我国目前的社会观念及未来刑事诉讼改革的发 展方向并不契合；“程序限制型’’模式会使一些刑事诉讼公理性原则遭到破坏， 有违程序公正理念，而且难以实现公正与效率的有机统一。笔者在对两种模式局 限性分析的基础上，对我国法院变更指控罪名的现状进行了反思与重构，最后提 出建议：通过建立公诉事实同一的诉因变更制度对我国法院变更指控罪名模式加 以改革。这一制度重构的正当性基础在于实现了程序公币和实体公正、公正与效 率的有机统一，较好地契合了我国未来刑事诉讼法改革的发展方向。 【关键词】变更指控罪名实体限制程序限制公诉事实同一诉因变更 AbstractIn Abstract In 1 999，the case of the Chongqing Hong Qiao has caused the hot discussion on the court’S changing the alleged charges．The theory circle and practice circle have published articles to express their opinions which are basically divided into two parts． One part are the supporters and the other hold the opposite opinion and bring up the program of the reform，they propose that the reform on the pattern of the court’S changing the alleged charges should draw on the experience of pattern of the Entities restrictions in British and American or of procedural restrictions in continental legal system．After taking the comprehensive investigation on the patterns of the court changing the alleged charges of British and American legal system and continental legal system，the author points out the advantages and disadvantages of the two legal systems that base on which he reflect and redesign the situation of the court’S changing the alleged charges．Because the cause of action is strict,the type of entity restriction will inevitably cause the entity unjusmess，and will be not comply with the development trends of our reform on criminal procedure code and the social concept． The type of the procedure restriction will destruct the axiomatic principle of the criminal procedure，which violates the concept of the procedure justice and hinders the organic unity of justice and efficiency．Finally,the conclusion is drawn that the reform of the patte