英语写作不同评价方式的对比研究.pdfVIP

Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all the teachers and friends who have helped me in my research process and thesis fulfillment. First of all, I am greatly indebted to Prof. Cheng Youqiang, my academic tutor and spiritual mentor. She walked me through all the stages of the writing of this thesis. Without her invaluable guidance and persistent help, I can never finish this research. Her profound knowledge, valuable experience and the way of thinking greatly influenced me. Secondly, I would also like to express my gratitude to two professors who shed light for me on how to do academic research. Prof. Wang Shiqings knowledge on second language acquisition and Prof. Wei Meis instructions on qualitative study are abundant academic resources for me. Thirdly, I also wish to thank all the teachers who have participated in my research patiently. They provided valuable data for this research. And also I would like to thank my classmates and friends who helped me during my thesis writing process. Finally, my special thanks should go to my parents who give me their deepest love and support all the time. II 摘要 本研究旨在对比在英语写作评价实践中，不同评价方式在定位错误和打分 上的表现。收集的31 篇英语作文分别被四种评价方式独立评价，即教师评价， 同伴评价，写作自动评价和作为参照的“理想评价”。单因素方差分析和非参数 独立多样本检验被用于分析四种评价方式之间在定位错误和打分上是否存在显 著性差异。 研究结果表明,首先，在定位错误总数和五大类型的错误数上，教师评价， 同伴评价和写作自动评价三种评价方式均不及 “理想评价”。此外，在定位错误 总数以及语法，词汇两类错误上，教师评价更接近于“理想评价”，同伴评价和 写作自动评价两种方式表现相似。在定位技术性细节错误上，写作自动评价更接 近于“理想评价”，教师评价和同伴评价两种方式表现相似。在定位结构和内容 两类错误上，三种评价方式表现相似。 其次，在打分上，教师评价，同伴评价和写作自动评价三种方式均不及“理 想评价”。同时，教师评价和写作自动评价两种方式在打分上表现相似，均更接 近于 “理想评价”。 关键词：英语写作；教师评价；同伴评价；写作自动评价 II