多维HO-DINA模型地开发和其在几何类比推理测验中地诊断应用.pdfVIP

studyfoundthat: 1,theresultofthetraditionalmodelMIRTinassessingtheabilityof participants parameters is not better than MHO DINA model.2, the result of the traditionalmodelHO-DINAinthe estimatedprojectparameters (s,g)andthemaster attributepattenofparticipantsissimilarwithMHO DINAmodel. Study4:MHODINAmodelappliedingeometryanalogicaltestdata,thenew model (MHO-DINA) parameter estimation results and the existing research of HODINA model parameter estimation results to make a comparative study, then found that the estimation result of the new model MHO DINA in participants parameterofgeometryanalogicaltestanditemparametershaveahighly significantly correlated with HO DINA model parameters. This explain that MHO DINA model applied to the analysis of the actural data is feasible.And compared with HO DINA model, MHO DINA model can provide about the every dimension of participants ability.Itismoredetailedinformation,whichhasreferencevalue. Key words: cognitive diagnosis model, High order DINA, MHO-DINA model, MCMCalgorithm IV 目 录 中文摘要3 英文摘要5 目 录6 1 引言1 1.1 研究的背景及意义1 1.2 研究目的1 1.3 本文主要创新点3 2 文献综述4 2.1 IRT基本简述4 2.1.1 IRT基本知识4 2.1.2 多维IRT模型5 2.2 认知诊断基本简述6 2.2.1 认知诊断基本知识6 2.2.2 几种常见认知诊断模型简介6 2.3 本研究领域国内外现状7 2.3.1 国内现状8 2.3.2 国外现状8 3 多维HO-DINA模型的开发10 3.1 多维HO-DINA模型的研究目的10 3.2 多维HO-DINA模型的构建10 4 多维HO-DINA模型性能研究12 4.1 研究目的12 4.2 研究过程12 4.2.1 多维HO-DINA模型的参数估计方法12 4.2.2 分析工具14 4.2.3 实验设计14 4.2.4 数据模拟14 4.2.5评价指标15 4.3 研究结果15 4.3.1 能力参数返真性16 V 4.3.2 项目参数返真性18 4.3.3 认知诊断的判定25 4.8 小结29