解释论视角下的环境公益诉讼主体.docVIP

PAGE PAGE 16 解释论视角下的环境公益诉讼主体 摘要：随着一系列新法的出台，环境公益诉讼制度已初步成型。原告主体资格问题是环境公益诉讼的“瓶颈”，实践中除了环保组织，检察机关与行政机关也参与诉讼。为了环境的保护与公益诉讼制度的更好发展，扩大原告范围已成为社会的共识。检察机关与行政机关应当有可依据的法律规定提起环境公益诉讼，公民个人需在现行法律框架下得到环境权利救济，环保组织提起公益诉讼不能仅依赖原则性的规定，而应当有实际可操作的具体要求。而从法律解释的角度论述上述问题，可在现行法律体系内促进原告主体资格问题理论与实践的发展。 关键词：环境公益诉讼；环境公益诉讼主体；环保组织 The Plaintiff of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in Interpretative Perspective Abstract: Along with a series of new laws, environmental public interest litigation system has been preliminary forming. Plaintiffs subject qualification bottleneck problem is the environment public interest litigation, practice in addition to the environmental protection organization, procuratorial organs and administrative organs was also involved in litigation. In order to better development of the environmental protection and public interest litigation system, expanding the scope of the plaintiff has become a social consensus. Inspection organs and administrative organs shall be based on the law of environmental public interest litigation, under the existing legal framework for private citizens to get environmental rights relief, environmental groups filed a public interest litigation can not only rely on the provisions of the principle, and should have the specific requirements of the actual operational. And discusses the problem from the perspective of legal interpretation, can promote the plaintiff main body within the existing legal system for the development of the theory and practice. Keywords: Environmental public interest litigation；Environmental public interest litigation subject；The environmental group 一、引言 我国的环境公益诉讼尚处于发展阶段，各类主体的起诉均有实践价值，切不可因环保法立法而将他们排除在原告主体之外。但无论是《民事诉讼法》对环境公益诉讼主体的原则性规定，还是新《环境保护法》的具体规定，都将公民这一环境保护之路上的重要主体排除在外。理论的倡导无法从实质上改变现有的环境公益诉讼，只有对现有法律体系的扩张才能从根本上重塑原告主体资格制度。本文将在解释论视角下讨论环境公益诉讼制度，以在实践中突破环保法关于环境公益诉讼原告主体的限制，为其他主体通过诉讼手段维护自己的环境权提供建议，为完善我国环境保护法律制度献上一份力。 二、环境公益诉讼基本概念辨析 环境法的基本理论为可持续发展观，随着这一理念在人们心中的深入，对环境的重视也得到了立法者的肯定。对于环境公益诉讼而言，诉讼主体资格不是单纯的诉讼权利，而是程序性权利与实体性权利的结合，在