“村改居”社区集体经济产权制度改革与探索——以福建省厦门市马垅社.pdfVIP

“村改居”社区集体经济产权制度改革与探索——以福建省

厦门市马垅社区为例

黄静晗;潘扬彬

【摘要】集体经济产权制度改革是“村改居”社区由传统农村经济社会管理体制

向城市社区治理机制顺利变革的关键环节，但改革还面临着清产核资过程不规范、

集体资产量化分配困难、集体经济组织运作管理机制不顺等问题。马垅社区作为厦

门市改革试点，“村改居”后较成功地进行了集体经济社区股份合作制改革，在加

强集体资产管理、保障村民权益、促进社区发展等方面取得显著成效，清产核资、

股权设置、折股量化、股权管理、收益分配、组织设计等改革环节的方案设计可供

借鉴。但其改革还不完善，存在强权精英的牟利空间，缺乏对股份合作社运作的有

效监督，产生了浓厚的社区福利主义。为此，要推动股份合作制度创新，加强政府

引导支持，提高社区内生发展能力，进一步推动改革发展。%Thepropertyright

reformofcollectiveeconomyisthekeypointforvillages-turned-

communitiestochangefromthetraditionalruralmanagementsystemto

themodernurbancommunitygovernancemechanism.Butmanyproblems

existinthereform.ForexamplE,assetcheckingisfarfromstandardization;

itisquitedifficulttoquantifyanddistributecollectiveassets;andthe

operatingmechanismofcollectiveeconomicorganizationsis

unreasonable.Asareformatorypilotplacewhereatraditionalruralvillage

istentativelyturnedintoanurbancommunity,Malongcommunity(under

thejurisdictionofXiamencity)succeededinthestock-cooperation-

system-orientedreformofcollectiveeconomyafterithadbeenturned

fromvillageintocommunity.Suchareformenhancedthemanagementof

collectiveassets,protectedtherightandinterestofthevastvillagers,and

promotedthecommunitydevelopment.Theexperiencefromthereformin

Malongcommunitycanbeusedforreference.Inspiteofadvantages,

however,itinevitablyleftspaceforthepowerfulelitetomakeprofit

illegallybecauseoflackingsufficientsupervisionandcontrolofthestock

cooperation,andformedstrongcommunitywelfare.Therefore,itis

suggestedthatthefollowingworkbedoneeffectivelytopushforwardthe

propertyrightreformofcollectiveeconomyinvillages-turned-

communities:promotingsysteminnovation,strengtheninggovernmental

guidanceandsupport,andimprovingtheinternalabilityofthevillages-

turned-communities.

【期刊名称】《沈阳农业大学学报（社会科学版）》

【年(卷),期】2012(01