- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
中文摘要
本文通过对《礼记·乐记》中记载的“礼”、“乐”、“政”、“刑”四者分别进行
考证,并对其相互之间的关系加以分析,认为礼乐政刑思想的核心就是“礼治”,
“礼乐政刑”是“礼治”的具体展开。在分析的过程中,笔者逐渐发现社会价值
观与社会控制手段的变化,或者说不同组合与社会治理的实际效果有一定的联
系。通过这样一种视角,本文对中国“礼治”的发展过程和西方“法治”发展过
程中各自的重要阶段都从价值观和社会控制手段入手进行了简单地梳理,并得出
“礼治”与“法治”发展轨迹中的某些值得关注的特点。最后,本文将“礼乐政
刑思想”与 80 年代后出现的“社会治安综合治理”以及“作为治国之道的综合
治理”的思想进行了比较,明确了各自的差异和值得借鉴的共同之处。同时也从
价值观和社会控制的角度对中国当前的法治建设提出了些许建议。
关键词:礼乐政刑思想、礼治、综合治理
1
Abstract
It is discussed in this thesis that the core idea of“Li(proprieties),Yue(Music),
Xing(punishment), Zheng(certain administrative aspects of government)is “Lizhi(rule
of the rites)”, which is the specifications of the former, by means of studying that four
ideas in “Book of Rites·Music” respectively, and analyzing their interrelations. In the
process of analysis, changes of social values and social controlling means are
gradually realized. In other words, there is some relationship between different
combinations and the practical effect of social governing. The thesis generalizes the
major stages in the development of both Chinese “rule of rites” and western “rule of
law” respectively, in the angle of values and social controlling means, and presents
some characteristics worthy of attention in the development of “rule of rites” and
“rule of law”. Comparison is made between ideas concerning “the thought of
‘Li,Yue,Xing,Zheng’” and ideas from the late 1980s “Comprehensive control of
public security” and “Overall governing of state affairs”. And differences and
similarities worth learning between are clear. Finally, through a perspective of social
values and controls, construction of present rule of law
文档评论(0)