- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Clinical observation of auricular diagnosis and treatment for sixty
cases with Lumbar Disc Herniation
Speciality: Acupuncture and Tuina
Author: Zhang Lili
Tutor: Prof. Ma Qijiang
Abstract
Objective:
With comparative observation between patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation and
healthy people diagnosed by three common ear diagnosis methods, the visual examination
method,palpation and electrical determination method,to obtain the clinical effects whether
the three methods have the difference or not;To explore the therapeutic effect of treating
the lumbar disc herniation by “cuting therapy” at the auricular reaction points .
Methods:
60 cases with lumbar disc herniation were randomly selected as observation group ,
and 30 cases healthy people as control. To observe the patients and healthy people’s
auricular points with the visual examination method, palpation and electrical determination
diagnostic method,and then do data statistical analysis to get the conclusion. By cuting
auricular positive points treatment on lumbar disc herniation, according to the score of the
Japanese Orthopaedic Association low back pain surgery(JOA) , and the scores were
compared among the improvement of symptoms situation to get the conclusion.
Results:
1.By detecting the auriculat positive points with the visual examination, palpation,
electrical measurement method and electrical determination diagnostic method, the
observation group and control group both have a very significant difference(P0.01).
2.Three different ear diagnostic methods in the observation group group by the
Wilcoxon rank sum test for the Multiple Comparison, have a very significant difference(P
0.017).
3.
您可能关注的文档
- 地西他滨联合丙戊酸钠对淋巴瘤细胞株Jurkat增殖凋亡影响的实验的研究.pdf
- 地佐辛对糖尿病神经病理性疼痛大鼠脊髓背角NMDA2B受体表达的影响.pdf
- 滇南边境地区虫媒病毒调查的研究.pdf
- 滇西地区翼状胬肉分布特点及其证型年龄性别相关性和复发性的研究.pdf
- 癫痫反复发作、脑损伤以及其卡马西平对大鼠脑内P糖蛋白表达及其调节的影响.pdf
- 典型断面节段模型风洞试验影响因素的研究.pdf
- 典型国家公务员养老保险比较及对中国的启示.pdf
- 电喷雾质谱法、紫外可见光谱法的研究脱氢枞胺衍生物和DNA的相互作用.pdf
- 电渗泵毫米整体柱电色谱联用测定食品防腐剂.pdf
- 电信运营商3G移动增值业务战略___运营商和CPSP合作策略探究.pdf
原创力文档


文档评论(0)