- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
护理干预对食管癌根治术患者术中相关护理并发症的影响.doc
护理干预对食管癌根治术患者术中相关护理并发症的影响
【摘要】 目的:探讨护理干预对食管癌根治术患者术中相关护理并发症的影响。方法:通过对2012年2月-2014年2月在本院进行食管癌根治术治疗的92例患者,随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组,每组46例。对照组患者仅给予常规护理,实验组患者给予在常规护理基础上实施护理干预,主要包括预防低体温护理、预防压疮和臂丛神经损伤护理、预防电刀灼伤护理、预防眼角膜炎的护理、预防静脉套管液体外渗护理。观察比较两组患者术中并发症发生情况和患者满意度差异。结果:实验组患者低体温、压疮、电刀灼伤、眼角膜炎、臂丛神经损伤、静脉套管液体外渗并发症发生率分别为4.35%、4.35%、2.17%、0、2.17%、4.35%较对照组患者明显降低,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);实验组患者的满意率为97.83%,明显高于对照组患者80.44%,比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:针对食管癌根治术患者术中并发症给予干预护理,降低术中并发症发生率,提高手术质量和患者满意度。护理干预对降低食管癌根治术患者术中相关护理并发症发生率具有重要意义,临床值得推广应用。
【关键词】 护理干预; 食管癌根治术; 术中护理并发症
【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the effects of nursing intervention in patients undergoing radical surgery-related complications of esophageal cancer care. Method: 92 cases from 2012 February to 2014 February in our hospital were esophageal cancer radical surgery patients, who were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each group contained 46 cases. The control group was only given routine nursing care, the experimental group received nursing intervention based on routine nursing care, including prevention of hypothermia nursing, pressure ulcers and brachial plexus injury nursing, electric knife burn care, corneal inflammation, venous cannula nursing fluid extravasation nursing. Difference and the satisfaction of patients complications were compared between the two groups. Result: The experimental group’s low body temperature, pressure sores, electric knife burns, eye keratinize, brachial plexus injury, intravenous canola liquid leakage complication rates was 4.35%, 4.35%, 2.17%, 0, 2.17%, 4.35%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group respectively, with significant differences (P0.05). Patient satisfaction rate of the experimental group was 97.83%, which was higher than 80.44% of the control group (P0.05). Conclusion: To give nursing intervention for patients with complications in radical resection of esophageal cancer, reduce the incidence of complications; improve operation quality and
文档评论(0)