Multiple Intelligences Theory in the High School English Teaching.docVIP

Multiple Intelligences Theory in the High School English Teaching [Abstract] put forward the new curriculum ‘for the development of all students, in order to round development of students, for students to write papers on behalf of the personality development’ philosophy of education, multiple intelligence theory, the realization of ‘three development’, especially for the Individualized Education provides an open platform. This article describes the eight aspects of the theory of multiple intelligences in the high school English teaching in the application of multiple intelligences explore the teaching of English in the teacher’s request. [Keywords:] High School English Teaching Theory of Multiple Intelligences ‘English course standard’ emphasizes individualized teaching, pointing out that English teaching should ‘seek to meet the different types and different levels of the needs of students so that each student received a healthy physical and mental development’. If any subject with the greatest degree of personalized approach to teaching, then the subject will produce the greatest effect. Theory of Multiple Intelligences for the implementation of individualized instruction to create the conditions. The core of the concept of multiple intelligences is to take seriously the individual differences of students, so that every student can receive the same good education, access to maximum development. Differences in intelligence features support for a new course ‘three development’ theory. Any person who has more or less have multiple intelligences, but the individual intelligence, personality, temperament and interests, just different. Some more prominent in some capacity, some capacity is relatively weak, teachers should pay attention to individual differences in aptitude to analyze the needs of students, teaching according to ability. Based solely on academic or traditional IQ tests and evaluation of whether the student’s intelligence level is not desirable, we m