论体育协会的诉讼地位及相关制度的完善——从quot;凤铝quot;和quot;光谷quot;两案说起.pdfVIP

2009 年 5 月 体育与科学 May 2009 第 30 卷第3 期(总第 178 期} Joumal of Spons and Science Vol30 No. 3CTo!al No. 178) 论体育协会的诉讼地位及相关制度的完善 一-从凤铭和光谷两案说起 On the Suit Status of Sport Association and the Improvement of Related Laws 一一-Taking Fenglu and Guanggu for Exemple 叶小兰I YE Xiaolan 1 摘要凤铝篮球俱乐部和光谷足冻俱乐部因对体育协会的决定不满而退出各自所在的体育 协会。在退出以后，按照现行的法律制度，无法通过诉讼进行权利的司法救济。从法律上肴，俱 乐部与单项体育协会之间的关系有两种g 一是乎等的民事法律关系，二是隶属型的管理关系. 这两种情形下产生的纠纷可以分别通过民事诉讼和行政诉讼来解决 o C 体育法》和三大诉讼法 应进行修改，明确体育协会的诉讼地位，同时应建立全国障体育仲裁机构作为诉讼机制的补充. 关键词:体育协会z 俱乐部p 民事诉讼;行政诉讼p 仲裁 中图分类号:G80 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1004-4590(2009)03一0016一04 Abstract: Fenglu basketball club and Guanggu f，∞tball club have ex.i ted from their own sport association for they dissatisfied with the decisions of the spo口s association. But after their ex.i t , they can t protect their rights through lawsuits according to current laws. There are two rela- tions between clubs and spo口 association: 呵ual civil relation and rnanagerial subject relation. The.conflicts in these two relations can be settled by civil suit and administrative suit. The S阴阳 Code and other procedure laws should be amended to give a clear suit 阳sition of sport associa- tio n. Nationwide sports arbitrator is necessary as a complement to the lawsuit systcm. Key WOI也: sports associationi sports clubi civil SUiti administrative suiti arbitration 赛资格。 10 月 21 日体育总局的回复认为，凤铝俱乐部所提出 1 两案的案情简介