论民事鉴定决定权 --从重复鉴定谈起.pdfVIP

广西政法管理干部学院学报 第 17 卷第2 期 JOURNAL OF GUAì叫GXI ADMINISTRATlVE Vol. 17.No.2 2002 年 6 月 CADRE INSTlTUTE OF POLITICS AND LAW Jun.2002 On the Decisive Right of Authentication in Civil Actions -Beginning with the Repeated Authentication YA阳Wen - ming1 , YOU Xiao - yomj (1. China 伽Jthwlωt University of Politiω Law , Chongqing 400031 2. Huizhou Intennediate 萨呻le s court of Guangdong pro巾α， Hui油ong 516001 ) [Ahstract] The uncleamess of decisive right of authentication is one of the disadvantages in current civil authentication sys- tem , especially one of main αuses of abusively repeated authenticatiα1. 50 it is a better point in the reform of c山Tent civil authen- tìcation system to pin归int to whom the decisive right of authentication should be attached to. With ∞mpansonωrelative laws and theori臼 in the USA , Japan and Taiwan District , this d时isive right should be allocated to the People s Courts ac∞，rding to theories of procedural laws. [Key words] civil action; authentication system; reformj 但isive right 论民事鉴定决定权 一一从重复鉴定谈起 杨文明1 ，游小勇2 (1.西南政法大学，重庆 400031;2. 广东惠州中级人民法院，广东惠州 516001) [摘要]民事鉴定决定权之归属不明是目前我国现行民事鉴 街道办、公安局、律师和人民法院;第二，鉴定次数多;第三， 定制度诸多弊端，尤其是重复鉴定泛滥的重要原因之一。因而，明 鉴定主体多;第四，各鉴定结论的内容相互冲突严重，让法 确氏事鉴定决定权的归属也就是改革现行民事鉴定制皮的较佳切 官无所适从;第五，耗时多，花费大。重复鉴定泛滥所体现 入点。通过比较美国、日本、我国台湾的相关立法和理论，结合诉 的诸多问题中，学者们论述较少的为第一点，即在事实上享 讼法原理论证，我国的民事鉴定决定权原则主应由法鹿享有。 有鉴定委托权的主体很多。而鉴定委托权与鉴定决定权是 [关键词]民事诉讼;鉴定制度;改革;决定权 紧密相关的，鉴定委托权的归属