从一重处断竞合条款的理解与适用——兼谈我国竞合 (罪数) 体系的构建.docVIP

“从一重处断”竞合条款的理解与适用——兼谈我国竞合 (罪数) 体系的构建 王彦强 南京师范大学法学院 南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院 X 关注成功！ 加关注后您将方便地在 我的关注中得到本文献的被引频次变化的通知！ 新浪微博 腾讯微博 人人网 开心网 豆瓣网 网易微博 摘????要： 经《刑法修正案 (九) 》修正, 采“分则个罪立法模式”的我国刑法中的竞合条款已基本呈现类型化和规模化, 即基本形成“从一重处断”条款、“从特别规定”条款和“数罪并罚”条款三足鼎立的局面, 这基本扭转了我国竞合 (罪数) 体系建构“无法可依”的尴尬局面。三元分立表明立法区别对待想象竞合、法条竞合与实质竞合的基本立场。“从一重处断”条款, 主要应作为想象竞合犯处置原则之规定, 但也可能是交差关系法条竞合和牵连犯等多行为处断一罪之处置原则的表征。对三分的竞合条款的解读也表明, 应当以实质的一罪、处断的一罪和实质的数罪为基本框架建构我国竞合 (罪数) 体系。 关键词： 竞合条款; 从一重处断; 想象竞合; 交差关系; 法条竞合; 多行为处断一罪; 基金：江苏高校优势学科建设工程 (PAPD) Understanding and Application of the Terms of “Convicted and Punished in Accordance with the Heavier Provision”:On the Construction of Concurrences ( Offense Countings) System Wang Yanqiang Abstract： The 9 th amendments of criminal law classified and systemized the concurrently applicable terms into three types: the terms of “Convicted and punished in accordance with the heavier provision”, the terms of “Convicted and punished in accordance with the special clause”and the terms of“joinder of punishments for plural crimes”. Those three types clearly showed that the legislation intended to differentiate “imaginative joiner of offenses”, “overlap of articles of law”and “plural offenses”.The clauses of “Convicted and punished in accordance with the heavier provision”can not only be regarded as the principle for punishment on “imaginative joiner of offenses”, but also be treated as the principle for punishment on the concurrence type of “multi-actors punished as a crime”and “cross relationship”, etc. which is one type of “overlap of offenses”. The interpretation on those three types of concurrently applicable terms also shows that we should divide our criminal concurrences system into three parts: “substantial single offense”, “Punished as single offense”and “substantial plural offenses”. Keyword： concurrently applicable terms; convicted and punished in accordance with the heavier provision; imaginative joiner of offenses; cross relationship; multi-actions punished as si