SLIPA喉罩与双管喉罩在甲状腺手术中应用效果比较.docVIP

SLIPA喉罩与双管喉罩在甲状腺手术中应用效果比较.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
SLIPA喉罩与双管喉罩在甲状腺手术中应用效果比较

SLIPA喉罩与双管喉罩在甲状腺手术中应用效果比较   [摘要] 目的 观察SLIPA、双管喉罩(PLMA)在甲状腺手术中的麻醉通气效果,探讨两者的安全性和有效性。方法 甲状腺手术患者90例,随机分为SLIPA组、PLMA组和气管导管组,每组30例。记录三组患者插喉罩(管)成功行机械通气即刻(T1)、肩垫高头后仰位后即刻(T2)、手术开始(T3)、术毕1 min(T4)的SpO2、气道峰压和呼末二氧化碳分压(PETCO2)、喉罩气道密封压。结果 SLIPA组气道密封压在T2、T3时间点较T1时间点有变化,差异有统计学意义。PLMA组气道密封压(P密封压)在T2、T3时间点较T1时间点有变化,差异无统计学意义。 结论 在甲状腺手术期间,SLIPA、PLMA可以实现有效通气,但SLIPA应密切监测通气指标。   [关键词] 喉罩;甲状腺手术;气道密封压   [中图分类号] R614[文献标识码] B[文章编号] 1673-9701(2014)16-0079-03      Application effect of SLIPA LMA and PLMA on the thyroid surgery   LI Hongbao1 HE Jianguo2   1.Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, China; 2.Department of Anesthesiology, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China   [Abstract] Objective To study the anesthetic and ventilation results of SLIPA LMA and PLMA in the thyroid surgery so as to explore their secuirty and effective degrees. Methods A total of 90 patients undergoing thyroid surgery were randomly divided into three groups: the SLIPA group, the PLMA group and the tracheal intubation group, with 30 cases in each group. The SpO2, Ppeak, PETCO2 and seal pressure of LMA at the mechanical ventilation time after the successful connection of LMA (tracheal intubation)(T1), the time when the shoulder was padded and the head fell backwards (T2), the time for surgery (T3), and 1 min after the surgery (T4) in the patients of these three groups were recorded. Results The airway seal pressure of SLIPA group varied at T2 and T3 compared with T1, and the difference was of statistical significant. The airway seal pressure of PLMA group(P seal pressure) changed at T2 and T3 compared with T1, and the difference was of no statistical significance. Conclusion During the thyroid surgery both SLIPA and PLMA could achieve effective ventilation, but the the ventilation index of SLIPA should be monitored closely.   [Key words] LMA; Thyroid surgery; Airway seal pressure随着麻醉技术的发展,特别是喉罩的发展,喉罩有不用喉镜暴露声门、不刺激气管、患者心血管反应轻、耐受性好等优点,越

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档