上胫腓关节生物力学研究.docVIP

上胫腓关节生物力学研究.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
上胫腓关节生物力学研究

上胫腓关节的生物力学研究   [摘要] 目的 探讨上胫腓关节的生物力学特征。 方法 收集10具成人尸体膝部标本,采用生物力学方法及压敏片技术测试不同体位下上胫腓关节的压力及上胫腓关节的受力面积。 结果 上胫腓关节的平均压力均显著小于内、外侧股胫关节的平均压力(P20°,P2组的倾斜度20°;在700N压力下,P1组的受力面积均显著小于P2组(P0.05),但P1组的平均压力显著大于P2组(P0.05),且不受体位的改变影响。 结论 跖屈位、内翻位时上胫腓关节承受压力大,上胫腓关节压力随踝关节体位的改变而改变,在处理上胫腓关节脱位时,需尽量避免行上胫腓关节融合术;倾斜型的上胫腓关节较水平型承受压力大,较易发生损伤。   [关键词] 上胫腓关节;股胫关节;生物力学;压敏片   [中图分类号] R687.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-9701(2016)06-0004-05   Biomechanics study on proximal tibiofibular joint   LU Jianzuo LIN Yangyang YANG Jie DONG Xiaomin PAN Jun   Department of Orthopaedics, the Peoples Hospital of Wenzhou City in Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325000, China   [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the biomechanics of upper tibiofibular joint. Methods Chose 10 knee specimens of adult cadavers as research object. The average pressure and stressed area of upper tibiofibular joint were detected by biomechanical method and pressure sensitive piece technology. Results The average pressure bear by superior tibiofibular joint was significantly less than medial/lateral tibiofemoral joint(P0.05). Under different pressure (700N, 1400N, 2800N), the stress area within superior tibiofibular joint in the neutral position was significantly less than it within superior tibiofibular joint in plantar flexion, back stretch, varus and valgus position (P0.05); the average pressure bear by superior tibiofibular joint in the neutral position was significantly less than it bear by superior tibiofibular joint in plantar flexion, back stretch, varus and valgus position(P0.05). P1 group was greater than 20°, P2 group was less than 20°. Under pressure of 700N, stress area for P1 group was significantly less than P2 group(P0.05), but the average pressure bear by P1 group was greater than the P2 group(P0.05), and the effect was independent of body position. Conclusion Because the superior tibiofibular joint bear more pressure under plantar flexion and varus position, and the pressure varies with the change of the ankle position. It is avoide

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档