全身麻醉下手法松解治疗重症肩周炎临床效果研究.docVIP

全身麻醉下手法松解治疗重症肩周炎临床效果研究.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
全身麻醉下手法松解治疗重症肩周炎临床效果研究   摘要:目的 观察全身麻醉下行手法松解治疗重症肩周炎的临床效果。方法 选取自2014年10月~2015年3月我院骨伤科门诊原发性重症肩周炎患者55例,分为口服药物治疗组(D组)、局部注射治疗组(I组)和全麻手法松解组(A组)。其中D组以非甾体镇痛药为主的口服药物治疗;I组予以0.5%利多卡因20 ml与得宝松(复方倍他米松)1 ml/7 mg组成的消炎镇痛液痛点注射;A组予以全身麻醉下手法松解术。疗程结束后2 w评价疗效、VAS和不良发应发生率。结果 A组患者术后2 w治愈率优于其他两组(P0.05),两组均高于D组(P0.05)。VAS在A组明显低于其他两组(P0.05)。三组间不良反应没有统计学差异,其中A组患者未发现有不良反应,其他两组分别为2例与1例。结论 对于重症肩周炎患者全麻下实施手法松解术优于口服药物治疗和局部注射治疗。   关键词:肩关节周围炎;手法松解;全身麻醉   中图分类号:R684 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1006-1959(2017)16-0058-02   Clinical Effect of Manipulation Loosening on the Treatment of Severe Scapulohumeral Periarthritis under General Anesthesia   ZHANG Dong-sheng   (Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,Jizhou District Hospital of Tianjin City,Tianjin 301900,China)   Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical effect of general anesthesia manipulation therapy for severe scapulohumeral periarthritis.Methods From October 2014 to March 2015 in our hospital outpatient primary severe periarthritis patients 55 cases,divided into oral drug treatment group(D group), local injection treatment group(I group)and general anesthesia manipulation group(A group).Oral drug group D with non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs treatment; group I received 0.5% lidocaine 20 ml and Diprospan(compound betamethasone)1 ml/7 mg composed of analgesic pain point injection;group A received general anesthesia maneuver release under the condition of operation.The curative effect,VAS and adverse reaction rate were evaluated two weeks after the end of treatment.Results The cure rate of A group was better than that of the other two groups(P0.05),and the two groups were higher than those in group D(P0.05).VAS was significantly lower in group A than in the other two groups(P0.05).There was no statistical difference in adverse reactions between the three groups, and no adverse reactions were found in the A group.The other two groups were 2 cases and 1 cases respectively.Conclusion For severe frozen shoulder patients,manual loosening under genera

文档评论(0)

小马过河 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档