公办与民办高校大学生压力应对方式和自尊比较分析.docVIP

公办与民办高校大学生压力应对方式和自尊比较分析 　　【摘要】 目的 探讨公、民办高校学生压力、应对方式和自尊的差异及相关性。方法 采用青少年生活事件量表、应付方式问卷、自尊量表对341名学生进行调查。结果 ①公、民办学生压力水平的差异无统计学意义，但在人际关系和健康适应因子上的差异大于其他因子；②公、民办高校学生在应对方式上的差异无统计学意义，但在退避方式的选择上差异接近显著；③公、民办高校学生自尊的差异有统计学意义；④自尊与人际关系、学习压力、受惩罚、其他、压力总分呈显著负相关；⑤自尊与解决问题、求助呈显著正相关，自尊与自责、幻想、退避、合理化呈显著负相关。结论 ①公、民办学生压力、应对方式不存在显著差异；②公办学生自尊显著高于民办学生；③自尊高的个体压力水平较低，反之亦然；④自尊高的个体倾向于选择解决问题、求助方式，自尊低的个体倾向于选择自责、幻想、退避、合理化。 　　【关键词】 公办高校；民办高校；压力；应对方式；自尊 　　Compared Analysis on Public and Private College Students Stress, Coping Strategy and Self-esteem. Lu Changchao, Zhou Fenli, Zhang Minrong. College of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xian 710127, P.R.China 　　【Abstract】 Objective To explore the difference and relativity among stress, coping strategy and self-esteem of public and private college students. Methods Making use of the scales of ASLEC, SES and CSQ to investigate 341 students. Results ①There are no significant differences between private and public college students in stress and coping strategy; ②The differences in self-esteem of public and private college students are statistically significant; ③Self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, the stress of study, punishment, the other and the stress scores suggest a significant negative relation; ④Self-esteem and problem-solving, assistance are significantly related, but self-esteem and self-blame, fantasy, passive and rationalization suggest a significant negative relation. Conclusion ①The differences between public and private college students in stress and coping strategy are not significant; ②The self-esteem of public college students is significantly higher than that of private students; ③If the self-esteem of the student is higher, the stress is lower; ④The higher self-esteem students tend to choose solving the problem and seeking assistance, and the lower ones tend to choose blame, fantasy, passive and rationalization. 　　【Key words】 Public and private colleges; Stress; Coping strategy; Self-esteem 　　 　　压力(Stress)也称为应激，L