协同护理模式对血液透析患者自我护理能力和生活质量影响.docVIP

协同护理模式对血液透析患者自我护理能力和生活质量影响.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
协同护理模式对血液透析患者自我护理能力和生活质量影响

协同护理模式对血液透析患者自我护理能力和生活质量影响   [摘要] 目的 研究?ρ?液透析患者提供协同护理模式的应用效果。 方法 将我院于2015年6~12月间接收47例终末期肾脏病接受血液透析治疗患者,作为对照组,为患者提供一般护理服务,于2016年1~6月间收治47例透析患者,作为观察组,为其提供协同护理模式,总结两组患者自护能力评价、对比两组患者生活质量评分、对比两组患者满意度评价结果。 结果 对照组患者对于疾病知识掌握、合理饮食、基础生活行为及病情监测等指标评分均低于观察组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组患者心理沟通、家庭融入度、躯体功能、日常生活行为等指标评分均低于观察组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。对照组患者对临床护理服务满意度为74.47%,观察组为93.62%,观察组患者满意度较高,两组差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。 结论 为血液透析患者提供协同护理模式,大部分患者均表示对临床护理服务感到满意,且患者自护能力及生活质量评分均较高。   [关键词] 协同护理模式;血液透析;自我护理能力;生活质量   [中图分类号] R473.71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 2095-0616(2017)07-112-04   Effect of collaborative nursing mode on self-nursing ability and quality of life of patients with hemodialysis   GUO Huankai CHEN Xiaohe LI Chunxi LIU Cailing LIANG Jinyun   Department of Nephrology,Jiangmen Central Hospital,Jiangmen 529000,China   [Abstract] Objective To research application effect of collaborative nursing mode on patients with hemodialysis. Methods 47 patient with end stage renal disease who received hemodialysis in our hospital from June 2015 to December 2015 were selected as the control group and they were given general nursing.47 patients with dialysis who were admitted to our hospital from January 2016 to June 2016 were selected as the observation group and they were given collaborative nursing mode.Self-nursing ability of patients in two groups was summarized.Quality of life score and evaluation results of patients’ satisfaction in two groups were compared. Results Mastery of knowledge about diseases, reasonable diet,basic living behavior,illness monitoring and other indexes scores of patients in the control group were all significantly lower than those of the observation group.Results were statistically significant(P0.05) and there was comparability.Psychological communication,family integration degree, physical function,behavior in daily life and other indexes scores of patients in the control group were all significantly lower than those of the observation group.Results were statistically significant(P0.

文档评论(0)

bokegood + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档