城市社区治理中的多元主体参与分析——以成都市锦水苑社区为个案-analysis of multi - subject participation in urban community governance —— a case study of chengdu jinshuiyuan community.docxVIP

Abstract With the development of our country city community, in the course of industrialization, speed up the informatization, constantly in the city, a profound change in community development morphology. In a pluralistic society, only rely on the government is difficult to achieve effective management, only the government, market, social benign interaction in order to adapt to the current economic and social change, promote the innovation of social management, speed up the transformation of government management mode. Therefore, how to promote the diversification of the main city in community governance participation, to accelerate the reform of the political system Chinese Chinese, promote the democratization process, achieve effective governance of community plays an extremely important role. In the industrialization, the urbanization strategy and strengthen the building of urban communities, Sichuan Chengdu innovation of grassroots social management, vigorously implement the urban and rural development and other economic and social background, this paper chose the Chengdu Community Governance Paradigm -- Jin Shui yuan community as the research object, the method with the adoption of literature study and case study, to participate in the problem of diversification of main city community governance in the researched. First of all, the author of the research background and significance, the domestic and foreign related research, research framework and methodology are outlined in the three part. In order to make the article more convincing with theory, the author of the city community, community governance subject core concepts are defined, at the same time, the theoretical basis to research of community governance theory, multi center governance theory also has carried on the correlation analysis. Secondly, the author of the Chengdu City Jin Shui yuan community diversified participation in governance status of the field survey and the individual interview, divers